Re: [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?

Still down either way... === ; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> dns1.sjl.youtube.com @a.gtld-servers.net ; (2 servers found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 22563 ;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1

Re: [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?

If they were anycasted, shouldn't they be reachable from _somewhere_ ? Those servers are dead from the 4 corners of the US that I have resources to use for testing. Brant I. Stevens wrote: > Maybe that block is anycasted? > > ___ NANOG mailing

Comcast - Stuck route in Chicago directing MN traffic via Denver

For the last couple weeks there has been a route stuck in the Chicago wan/core that is directing some Minnesota-bound traffic through Denver, even though Chicago and the Roseville, MN aggregation remain up and directly connected. This has the dual benefit of unnecessarily increasing the load o

Re: Comcast - Stuck route in Chicago directing MN traffic via Denver

.mn.comcast.net (76.113.128.1) 12.203 ms 12.203 ms 12.045 ms -Eric Eric Spaeth wrote: For the last couple weeks there has been a route stuck in the Chicago wan/core that is directing some Minnesota-bound traffic through Denver, even though Chicago and the Roseville, MN aggregation remain up and

Re: Revealed: The Internet's well known BGP behavior

Jon Lewis wrote: At 11:32 PM 27-08-08 -0500, John Lee wrote: They didn't have control of any routers other than their own. What they had to find is a single clueless upstream ISP that would allow them to announce prefixes that didn't belong to them. Clueless or big and inattentive? AFAIK,