This may sound like dumb question, but... I'm used to asking those.
Here's the scenario
Another ISP, say AT&T, is the primary ISP for a customer.
Customer has publicly accessible servers in their office, using the AT&T
address space.
I am the customer's secondary ISP.
Now, if AT&T link fails,
That's a good point Ray - thank you.
>
> From: Ray
>To: Matthew Crocker ; Eric A Louie
>
>Cc: NANOG
>Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 6:31 PM
>Subject: RE: ISP inbound failover without BGP
>
>
>
>
>Depending on their bu
er - "How come AT&T is down, and
we're not getting inbound traffic to our servers?", and I discover L3 or
CenturyLink isn't accepting my advertisement for some weird reason, but they
won't fess up to it for a few frustrating hours)
>____
Divided into vertical sections, it requires a new set of hinges and doors and
lock slots front and rear, as well as solid shelves between the sections.
Think about it for a moment, or go visit your nearest colocation center and ask
to see a 1/2 or 1/3 rack. I actually have a 1/3 rack at one of
My company is investigating offering MPLS service in a very limited regional
area.
We're interested in any input in the following:
Pricing strategy
Order form
Operational considerations
Service level agreements
If you have something to offer, on or off-list responses are invited.
thanks
Eric
I'm looking for IPAM solutions for a small regional wireless ISP. There are 4
Tier 2 personnel and 2 NOC technicians who would be using the tool, and a small
staff of engineers.
They have regionalized IP addresses so blocks are local, but there are subnets
that are global.
don't care if it's
g/ is the one I used.
I've looked at IPPLan but have not installed it yet. Does anyone with direct
experience with it care to share their view?
Much appreciated, Eric
From: Aftab Siddiqui
To: Eric A Louie
Cc: NANOG Operators' Group
Sent: Thu
ut there who want to comment?
Much appreciated, Eric
From: Nick Hilliard
To: Aftab Siddiqui
Cc: Eric A Louie ; NANOG Operators' Group
Sent: Thu, December 13, 2012 2:25:10 AM
Subject: Re: IP Address Management IPAM software for small ISP
On 13/12/2012 10
upports v4 and v6. It's
available on sourceforge:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/subnetsmngr/?source=directory
Jeremy Malli
Mammoth Networks
On 12/12/2012 6:22 PM, Eric A Louie wrote:
> I'm looking for IPAM solutions for a small regional wireless ISP. There are 4
> Tier 2 perso
It looks like it's hosted only - true? That's neither a good or bad - but the
MRC could be a concern.
Much appreciated, Eric
From: Mike Walter
To: Eric A Louie ; "nanog@nanog.org"
Sent: Thu, December 13, 2012 12:25:44 PM
Sub
Only if you install it for me, Pierre! :-) (I'm not a sysadmin, I just play
one on the Internet)
Software prerequisite
Netmagis needs the following software:(not the usual yada yada yada, to quote
Google)
Much appreciated, Eric
From: Pierre DAVID
To: NA
Thanks James. We just activated a demo with 6Connect last week. We'll see how
it goes.
Much appreciated, Eric
From: James Wininger
To: Eric A Louie
Cc: ""
Sent: Mon, December 17, 2012 8:56:53 AM
Subject: Re: IP Address Management IPAM sof
I'm investigating colocation space in the following cities
Irvine, CA
San Francisco, CA
Las Vegas, NV
Phoenix, AZ
Does anyone have recommendations for (or against) any specific colo? I'll need
1/3 rack, 16 amp power (or 8 amp 220V), fiber cross to 1GB ISP upstream
(haven't
chosen the ISP yet,
Does anyone have recommendations for Colocation space in any of those 4 cities?
thanks
Eric
how is that really much different than "reachability"? If I look at my present
Netflow results, it's actually a pretty amusing mix - lots of Netflix traffic
(bear in mind we're a business ISP, not residential), Google (probably YouTube
in there, I haven't dissected it thoroughly), Amazon, Yahoo
"...and leave my BN alone, please - go play with the AGS"
>
> From: "valdis.kletni...@vt.edu"
>To: Ben
>Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 7:40 AM
>Subject: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
>
>
>On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:05:01 +0100, Ben sa
try calling the local datacenters and see if one of them will "loan" you one
for a day or two.
>
> From: Chris Cariffe
>To: NANOG
>Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2013 7:19 PM
>Subject: Phoenix - Single Mode SFP GBIC
>
>
>Any chance someone can help me out with
Have you tried the (possible stale) info from ARIN?
http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/DS538-ARIN.html
>
> From: Alain Hebert
>To: 'NANOG list'
>Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 9:06 AM
>Subject: Need offlist contact for relay.globetrotter.net
>
>
> Well,
>
I know you said open source, but we're using Solarwinds Cattools with very good
results. We also have Rancid running in the background.
>
> From: Job Snijders
>To: nanog@nanog.org
>Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:25 PM
>Subject: Network configuration arch
Scenario: a regional ISP preparing to cutover to a new upstream BGP provider at
one of my POPs. Want minimal or no network disruption, and want to ensure
everything is ready to go prior to the cutover.
I'm planning to use the following order of operations:
1. Establish IP connectivity to the n
h tcp brief
all" and "sh tcp" - we are not getting the TCP connection to stay up.
Has anyone seen this series of messages on a Cisco/Juniper BGP session? Any
resolution?
>________
> From: Joe Abley
>To: Eric A Louie
>Cc: "nanog@
/05/lucy-you-got-some-splainin-to-do.html
>____
> From: Daniel Rohan
>To: Eric A Louie
>Cc: Joe Abley ; "nanog@nanog.org"
>Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 10:55 AM
>Subject: Re: BGP neighbor/configuration testing
>
>
>
ovember 25, 2013 11:10 AM
>Subject: Re: BGP neighbor/configuration testing
>
>
>Authentication failure might mean (without knowing for sure which on
>Cisco):
>
>- mismatch AS numbers
>- mismatch neighbor IP addresses
>- multihop/TTL issues
>- MTU issues
>
>On
mit for
>the session. One side will get stuck in Idle state which may cause
>the other side to send the same "authentication failure" notification.
>
>On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 03:07:28PM -0800, Eric A Louie wrote:
>> All Cisco/Cisco, I don't have a Juniper here to test with
&
doing 2 more times next month.
>____
> From: Eric A Louie
>To: "nanog@nanog.org"
>Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 5:21 PM
>Subject: Re: BGP neighbor/configuration testing
>
>
>No logged error with mismatched neighbor IP address - neither router had an
Ask to be escalated to Tier 2. If they can't help, ask for another escalation.
Show them traceroutes if you can (maybe from your phone or from one of us)
from other networks so they can see where it's dying.
>
> From: Phil Karn
>To: NANOG
>Sent: Tuesday,
When I had that problem, it was because the max-prefixes on the Juniper router
was being triggered. If I remember correctly. It's a strange return message
for the wrong issue.
>
> From: Philip Lavine
>To: NANOG list
>Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 7:
When I had that problem, it was because the max-prefixes on the Juniper router
was being triggered. If I remember correctly. It's a strange return message
for the wrong issue.
>
> From: Philip Lavine
>To: NANOG list
>Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 7:
I have a connection to a peering fabric and I'm not distributing the peering
fabric routes into my network.
I see three options
1. redistribute into my igp (OSPF)
2. configure ibgp and route them within that infrastructure. All the default
routes go out through the POPs so iBGP would see packe
;t" do this.
>
>--
>TTFN,
>patrick
>
>
>On Jan 14, 2014, at 21:22 , Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Cb B wrote:
>>> On Jan 14, 2014 6:01 PM, "Eric A Louie" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have a conn
c prefixes coming from the
other fabric members.
>
> From: Eric A Louie
>To: Patrick W. Gilmore ; NANOG list
>Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 10:22 PM
>Subject: Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes
>
>
>Thank you - I wi
et the BGP tables
working correctly with a full mesh of the 5 routers, so it looks like time to
try it again, this time with a route reflector.
>
> From: Christopher Morrow
>To: Eric A Louie
>Cc: Patrick W. Gilmore ; NANOG list
>Sent: Tuesda
Who would I start talking to if I wanted to lease "dark fiber" from point to
point?
I'm located in San Diego and am interested in leasing fiber from major
datacenters in SD and LA
I found Freedom Telecommunications (http://freedomtelecommunications.com) -
doubtless there are others I can and
I had this question posed by a marketing type in my office. Does anyone know
the answer?
Is it microsoft.com, msdn, outllook365, msn.com, outlook.com, azure, windows
updates, xbox? what else is possibly covered or omitted in their peering
service? I suppose we have a customer who is an Azure
access.
On Sunday, April 3, 2016 4:04 PM, "valdis.kletni...@vt.edu"
wrote:
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 18:02:56 -, Eric A Louie via NANOG said:
> I suppose we have a customer who is an Azure customer that wants to know if
> their Azure traffic will stay in our networ
35 matches
Mail list logo
