> On Mar 31, 2020, at 7:19 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 26/Mar/20 02:50, Job Snijders wrote:
>> Dear group,
>>
>> Exciting news! Today NTT's Global IP Network (AS 2914) enabled RPKI
>> based BGP Origin Validation on virtually all EBGP sessions, both
>> customer and peering edge. This c
> On Jun 16, 2020, at 7:53 AM, John Kristoff wrote:
> when Google got people worried about dropping routes.
>
That may have an impact down the road, but I doubt that really had that much
impact on current deployments.
-dorian
> On Jun 19, 2020, at 11:34 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>
>>
>> MPLS was since day one proposed as enabler for services originally
>> L3VPNs and RSVP-TE.
>
> MPLS day one was mike o'dell wanting to move his city/city traffic
> matrix from ATM to tag switching and open cascade's hold on tags.
A
Wouldn't it be better to leave such labels and judgements to future
generations? I'm sure they'll be the best judge of who led them to paradise
/ruin.
-dorian
On Jul 23, 2014, at 3:23 AM, Matthew Petach wrote:
>> We don't have a direct customer relationship with NTT so am hoping
>> someone on this list may be able to pass this information along or
>> investigate on our behalf.
>>
>> Ray
>>
>>
> I'm sure there's NTT folks watching the thread go
> pas
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:15:35PM -0500, Mauch, Jared wrote:
> > Also, who tests snmp WRITE in their code? at scale? for daily
> > operations tasks? ... (didn't the snmp incident in 2002 teach us
> > something?)
>
> There's no reason one can't program a device with SNMP, the main issue IMHO
Ther
No one had hit the ISIS bug before the IETF enforced maintenance freeze because
no one in their right mind would be running three week old code back then. I
don't think things have changed that much. ;)
-dorian
On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:19 PM, Siegel, David wrote:
> I remember being glued to my wor
On Jul 27, 2014, at 1:41 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
> Telecommuting can work out amazingly well,
> for the right people. But it takes dedication
> and focus, and a relentless willingness to
> be accessible to your coworkers.
It also takes an organization committed to it as well.
-dorian
On Jul 28, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
> On Jul 28, 2014, at 9:28 AM, William Herrin wrote:
>> The data set suffers three flaws:
>
> Depending on your point of view, a lot more than three, undoubtedly.
>
>> 1. It is not representative of the actual traffic flows on the Internet.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:15:36AM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> Composed on a virtual keyboard, please forgive typos.
>
> > On Aug 13, 2014, at 22:59, Suresh Ramasubramanian
> > wrote:
> >
> > Swisscom or some other European SP has / used to have a limit where they
> > would not accept
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 01:47:20AM -0400, Dorian Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:15:36AM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> > Composed on a virtual keyboard, please forgive typos.
> >
> > > On Aug 13, 2014, at 22:59, Suresh Ramasubramanian
> > > wro
> On Oct 30, 2014, at 8:23 AM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Ben Sjoberg wrote:
>
>> That 3Mb difference is probably just packet overhead + congestion
>
> Yes... however, that's actually an industry standard of implying
> higher performance than reality, because end
Personally I hope that such an environment never happens. Fast/slow lanes are
pretty meaningless. Such service differentiation only has meaning when there’s
persistent congestion and I’d rather that networks work out ways to scale past
demand rather than throttle them.
-dorian
> On Nov 6, 201
AS2914 has a tradition of bidding farewell to technical team members who
move on via router dns record . Charles was one of our NOC engineers.
IIRC, we stole this idea from the vBNS team back in the 90s.
-dorian
> On Feb 13, 2016, at 3:12 PM, Jared Geiger wrote:
>
> So who is this Charles fel
I don’t believe anyone has significant IP network capacity going EU ->
Australia in that direction, esp. since once you get to Singapore, the options
to get to Australia are limited.
Even for networks that do have EU to Asia connectivity via Indian Ocean or land
route to north Asia, the preferr
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”
-Santayana
Quite relevant in our industry that seems be more hell bent on rehashing ideas
and plot lines than Hollywood.
-dorian
> On Jun 6, 2015, at
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 06:39:48PM -0500, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2013, at 6:03 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > as someone who does not really buy the balanced traffic story, some are
> > eyeballs and some are eye candy and that's just life, seems like a lot
> > of words to justify variou
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:52:51PM +, Warren Bailey wrote:
> My.. Our.. Users expect one thing..
>
> Internet.
Isn't the ability to download something that they want part of the Internet
thing that users expect from their service providers?
-dorian
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 08:27:56PM -0700, Matthew Petach wrote:
> In Asia, there is a popular, but incorrectly named product offering
> that many ISPs sell called "domestic transit" which they sell
> for price $X; for "full routes" you often pay $2X-$3X. I grind my
> teeth every time I hear it, si
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:38:38PM -0500, Andrew Odlyzko wrote:
> Apologies for intruding with this question, but I can't think
> of any group that might have more concrete information relevant
> to my current research.
>
>
>
> Enclosed below is an announcement of a paper on technology bubbles.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 05:41:16PM -0500, Benson Schliesser wrote:
>
> On 11 Aug 10, at 5:15 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
> >> Obviously I can't speak for the providers in question, but I'd guess
> >> that the cost for transit in AP is strongly related to the cost of
> >> long-haul transport.
> >
>
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 06:27:38PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> 1) Old stodgy tier 1's who have communities but don't want to share them
> with the world, because of silly NDA concerns or the like. This covers a
I'm curious, since when did respecting bounds of contracts and agreements
on
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 06:49:03PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> > I'm curious, since when did respecting bounds of contracts and agreements
> > one has signed become "stodgy"?
>
> There is no excuse for not being able to tell people where you learned a
> route from (continent, region, ci
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:39:31PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
> Upgraded to M8.8 24km deep. This is a big one.
M8.8 at 05:46:23 UTC and M6.4 at 06:06:11 UTC so far according to USGS.
-dorian
I think it's probably more useful for people to follow this instead
of media reports:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/quakes_big.php
-dorian
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 07:29:29AM -0700, Garret Picchioni wrote:
> Does anyone have any stats on route updates that might suggest the
> possibility of fiber on the ocean floor being damaged?
There are some submarine cable outages but I don't believe exact
locations of damage has been isolated. I
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 04:21:59PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2011 14:53:53 CDT, Michael Sabino said:
> > If you are a big corporation, and it is 1995, how likely is it that you'll
> > utilize bgp for advertising your address space to the internet?
>
> Well, we got AS13
27 matches
Mail list logo