Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap

2011-08-20 Thread Denis Spirin
Hello All, I was hired by the Russian ISP company to get it back to the business. Due to impact of the financial crisis, the company was almost bankrupt, but then found the investor and have a big wish to life again. When I tried to announce it's networks, upstreams rejected to accept it because

Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap

2011-08-20 Thread Denis Spirin
> >What's the prefix you claim is hijacked? > > /as > > On 20 Aug 2011, at 22:05, Denis Spirin wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > I was hired by the Russian ISP company to get it back to the business. > Due > > to impact of the financia

Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap

2011-08-20 Thread Denis Spirin
RIPE NCC staff is already doing its investigation. And RIPE NCC can't stop the routing at all. 2011/8/21 Suresh Ramasubramanian > Just as interesting is that those prefixes are certainly on spamhaus. > > This should turn out very interesting indeed - maybe RIPE NCC should > just reclaim those p

Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap

2011-08-20 Thread Denis Spirin
ng. > > .as > > > On 20 Aug 2011, at 23:05, Denis Spirin wrote: > > Right now there are: > 46.96.0.0/16 > 83.223.224.0/19 > 94.250.128.0/19 > 94.250.160.0/19 > 188.164.0.0/24 > > >

Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap

2011-08-20 Thread Denis Spirin
mass spamming from it. 2011/8/21 Suresh Ramasubramanian > You could ask that they withdraw the prefixes and see if that works? > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Denis Spirin > wrote: > > RIPE NCC staff is already doing its investigation. > > > > And RIP

Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap

2011-08-21 Thread Denis Spirin
Hi Erik, The RIPE DB shows clear Internap have NO permission to route our networks as the direct uplink. Am I wrong? 2011/8/21 Erik Bais > Hi Denis, > > If Portnap doesn't / won't assist in this matter, you can send an abuse > message to both Tinet and NTT and have them reject the prefixes on t

Fwd: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap

2011-08-21 Thread Denis Spirin
Of course, we have less customers than we have a year ago. Not a zero in any case. Some parts of network was rented to other ISPs and will be returned. Some was NATed after upstream shut down the BGP. How much IP we need now we will discuss with RIPE NCC, if they will. First, we should have to shut

Fwd: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap

2011-08-21 Thread Denis Spirin
011/8/21 Arturo Servin > > On 21 Aug 2011, at 00:28, Denis Spirin wrote: > > > Yes, they are using our ASN 31733 to originate networks. All the visible > > paths are through AS12182. Internap was contacted about a week ago, but > did > > nothing. > > Whi

Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap

2011-08-25 Thread Denis Spirin
ly to RCPT TO command) So I have to continue to use TOR when write to NANOG. P.S. Abuse department of Telia rejected my list with the same reason, which has surprised me a lot. 2011/8/21 Adrian > On Saturday 20 August 2011 18:05, Denis Spirin wrote: > > Hello All, > > &g

Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap

2011-08-28 Thread Denis Spirin
Hi All, I looked up here http://www.robtex.com/as/as31733.html#graph internap on 24th of August and found Internap announced our networks to Telia, Cogent, NTT, Glbx and Tinet. I wrote to all of them. First reply was from Tinet. They even had a time and wish to call me by the phone. They said sto

Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap

2011-08-31 Thread Denis Spirin
Hello All, let me tell you the final of the story with the hijacking of our networks. So, in the end of July, we found some of our networks are announced somewhere without our permission. That was the illegal announce from Internap. We sent the letter to Internap on August, 11th. Internap replied