Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming

2010-11-19 Thread David Israel
On 11/19/2010 4:57 AM, George Bonser wrote: It's always two bytes, but people may choose to omit them. That is a social, not a (purely) technical, syntax, though. Richard That's exactly what I was going to say but didn't want to quibble. We tend to call them "quads" at work. What do you ca

Re: Route Optimization Software / Appliance

2011-08-23 Thread David Israel
This is basically Arbinet's "Optimized" product; it uses actual measurements for loss, round trip time, and jitter to choose routes. Right now, it is just sold as a service, going through the providers they sell access to; I don't know if you could purchase/license the software for your own

Re: NAT444 or ?

2011-09-07 Thread David Israel
On 9/7/2011 3:24 PM, Seth Mos wrote: I think you have the numbers off, he started with 1000 users sharing the same IP, since you can only do 62k sessions or so and with a "normal" timeout on those sessions you ran into issues quickly. Remember that a TCP session is defined not just by the po

Re: Microsoft deems all DigiNotar certificates untrustworthy, releases

2011-09-13 Thread David Israel
On 9/13/2011 10:29 AM, Tei wrote: *a random php programmer shows* He, I just want to self-sign my CERT's and remove the ugly warning that browsers shows. I don't want to pay 1000$ a year, or 1$ a year for that. I just don't want to use cleartext for internet data transfer. HTTP is like telnet,

Re: ouch..

2011-09-14 Thread David Israel
On 9/14/2011 10:41 AM, Leigh Porter wrote: On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:33 -0500, N. Max Pierson wrote: Either way, it's pathetic. If someone is going to slander in the fashion the site has done, they should at least put a contact form somewhere for some feedback :) Slander means falsehood. Cisco t

Re: quietly....

2011-02-15 Thread David Israel
On 2/15/2011 5:08 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: On 14 feb 2011, at 6:46, Frank Bulk wrote: Requiring them to be on certain well known addresses is restrictive and creates an unnecessary digression from IPv4 practice. It's comments like this that raise the hair on admins' necks. At least min

Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...

2011-02-17 Thread David Israel
On 2/17/2011 1:31 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote: IPv6's momentum is a lot like a beach landing at Normandy. As in, "large, dedicated, and nigh unstoppable, but fraught with peril and with a lot of mess and destruction to get through before it is done," or as in "mainly opposed by aging crazy Nazis

Re: IPv6 day non-participants

2011-06-08 Thread David Israel
On 6/8/2011 6:18 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: On Jun 8, 2011, at 12:49 PM, George B. wrote: Was participating until we hit a rather nasty load balancer bug that took out the entire unit if clients with a short MTU connected and it needed to fragment packets (Citrix Netscaler running latest cod