We got a panic message about the PFE that core'd and looks like it restarted
our FPC's.
JUNOS 10.2R2.11
-Dan
On Nov 7, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Kelly Kane wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 07:06, Tim Vollebregt wrote:
>>
>> On #IX there are rumours about Junos version 10.3R2
ement nightmare just for ASN's.
-Dan
On Jun 10, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Bruce Pinsky wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> On Jun 10, 2013, at 13:36 , Bruce Pinsky wrote:
>>> Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>>
>>&
tally/ send emails with full header
personalization?
accidentally on purpose.
-Dan
.
Got links?
Ask Google, Apple and Amazon. I'm sure they have the receipts.
You made the claim.
-Dan
.
With many corporations obeying chinese censorship orders, I would not be
so sure about the latter.
https://www.reddit.com/r/HongKong/comments/dfg1ce/list_of_companies_under_chinas_censorship_orders/
-Dan
Someone in TATA networking, if you could please contact me off-list, I'd
appreciate it. This relates to my day job doing DNS things for ISC.
-Dan
--
--------Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/
paypal used to openly support token 2fa, but have since made it nearly
impossible to use hardware tokens. they try very hard to ram sms down
everyones throats.
-Dan
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021, Mel Beckman wrote:
No, every SMS 2FA should be prohibited by regulatory certifications. The telcos
had
he FCC can
only send press releases.
-Dan
to move
files I can burst to speeds that aren't embarrassing in 2021.
Higher bandwidth is both welcome and necessary. It doesn't have to be
sustained throughout the contract to be required. The only question is how
feasible it is, and I suspect it's quite feasible for larger play
I only just now found this thread, so I'm sorry I'm late to the party, but
here, I put it on Medium.
https://gushi.medium.com/the-worst-day-ever-at-my-day-job-beff7f4170aa
> On Mar 12, 2021, at 10:07 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> Hardly famous and not service-affecting in the end, but figured I'd
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/01/07/icann_verisign_fees/
98% of the comments were opposed.
How many / which companies would have to get onboard in order to get
enough support for an icann alternative?
Is such a thing even feasible?
-Dan
Is anyone from EA or elsewhere able to provide me a contact for EA Mobile's
NOC?
can or should be done when a registry goes rogue?
-Dan
.
>
> Yes, most ddos traffic is ipv4 udp and yes Google was made aware that they
> would be mixing with bad company in the pool of ipv4 udp traffic ... but they
> have reasons.
>
> I am not a fan of quic or any udp traffic. My suggestion was that Google use
> an new L4 instead of UDP, but that was too hard for the Googlers.
>
> So here we are.
>
> Just say no to udp.
>
>
>
>
> -- Dan
There are choices, such as making connection initiation, connection acceptance,
and connection termination parsable by network elements on the path so state
can be established, maintained, and cleared, DoS can be identified, and so on.
The decision was to hide all that from network elements.
-
lition of Senators are now pressuring
other ISPs to follow suit.
--
Dan White
Network Admin Lead
On 03/17/20 19:25 +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
Le 17/03/2020 à 19:17, Dan White a écrit :
Things have been eerily quiet where we are (Oklahoma). We're an eyeball
network and have had no noticeable changes in bandwidth usage that
couldn't
be explained by statistical noise.
We
er night, presumably to implement toll fraud. We were in
the middle of working out work-from-home plans and were quite distracted
with other things. We managed to get on top of it quickly once someone
noticed.
Attackers taking advantage of this situation is a serious concern.
--
Dan White
Network Admin Lead
On 03/18/20 09:29 -0500, Blake Hudson wrote:
On 3/17/2020 1:54 PM, Dan White wrote:
On 03/17/20 14:38 -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 08:38:28AM -0700, Mike Bolitho wrote:
That's the good news. Here's the bad news: in about 2-3 weeks, when
our health care s
Is there anyone from Twitter here who can contact me off-list to resolve a
geo IP issue with our newly allocated block 158.51.80.0/22?
Sadly I've discovered that >95% of scammers have caught on to lenny by
now, and hang up within the first few seconds of hearing him.
I guess they've been thoroughly lenny'd already so he's no longer
effective.
-Dan
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, JASON BOTHE via NANOG wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Kushal R. wrote:
As far as that tweet is concerned, it???s pending for 16 days because
they have been blocked from sending us any emails due to the sheer
amount of emails they started sending and then our live support chats.
This is not an acceptable answer.
-Dan
? I thought the big problem is
that they are trivially capable of covering their tracks.
I think the bigger issue is they are all entirely operated out of india.
-Dan
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020, Matt Corallo via NANOG wrote:
Please don't use this kind of crap to send automated "we received 3 login attempts
on our SSH box..wa" emails.
This is why folks don't have abuse contacts that are responsive to real issues
anymore.
Thats what SBL is for.
-Dan
trouble sleeping at night, I’d recommend the
“PasswordAuthentication no” option in sshd_config.
you either care about reports of potentially compromised hosts on your
infrastructure or you don't.
-Dan
Look into EDFA amplifier systems. They work over a range of bands and are
pretty affordable.
They can carry regular 1310nm as well as C-Band. Although if you are
carrying C-band you may have to compensate for chromatic dispersion.
Happy to help, I love this stuff!
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:39 PM
> Are you saying we could use normal QSFP28 LR4 or ER4 modules with an
amplifier in between?
Yes, that is the idea from 30,000 ft. Fun fact, the ER4 optics you mention
are amplified inside the pluggable in a very similar manner to how these
EDFA systems work.
Basically: QSFP28 100G ER <-> EDFA Amp
n for days, I think that is so
interesting, but a little outside the scope of this chain. Whatever
manufacturer you engage with will help with that. Thankfully this tech has
gotten to the point where we can just slap that module in and not worry
about what is actually going on behind the scenes.
- Dan
://www.turris.com/en/mox/overview/
-Dan Sneddon
> On Feb 10, 2022, at 10:51 AM, j...@cleverhack.com wrote:
>
> Hello NANOG,
>
> My name is Joy Larkin and I'm actually a long-time years-long lurker on the
> NANOG list (I have v odd hobbies) and I am also ZeroTier's Head of
Hey there all,
I have vague memories of some group running a routing registry that was shut
down in the late 90s/early 2000s and I could’ve sworn it was ARIN. It might’ve
been Internic or something like that as well. Does anyone have any
recollection of this?
My Google searching for “retired
it.
-Dan
all.
Thanks,
Baldur
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610email: dwh...@mybtc.com
http://www.btcbroadband.com
ip prefix-list root-dns seq 1 permit 198.41.0.0/24
ip prefix-list root-dns seq 2 permit 199.9.14.0/24
ip pre
on't know due to inefficient
routing, e.g. customers hitting a public anycast DNS server in the wrong
location resulting in Geolocation issues.
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610email: dwh...@mybtc.com
http://www.btcbroadband.com
ould still be fairly efficient unless you're picking up transit
from non-local providers over extended L2 links.
We've had no issues so far but this was a recent change. There was no
noticeable change to outbound traffic levels.
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.
here. known complacent/spam-friendly providers.
-Dan
I received a credit card scam addressed to my one-off unique address
registered to fedex.com.
So it seems fedex.com user database has been compromised. Change your
logins asap.
-Dan
Phishing scheme didn't happen.
fedex has had a number of major compromises so it's not a stretch that
their user database was stolen and sold to spammers.
-Dan
On Thu, 30 May 2019, Matt Hoppes wrote:
Possibly. The other possibility I can think of is that you succumbed to a
phish
The one-off email scheme is not predictable. It is randomly generated
string of characters.
$ ./randgen
jvtMDluV0lwnlY5O
So you can totally eliminate that possibility entirely.
-Dan
On Fri, 31 May 2019, Jason Kuehl wrote:
Is it possible, yes. I've seen it several times now at my pla
o criminal trespass and destruction of
property.
https://twitter.com/JayTHL/status/1128700101675954176
remain ignorant if you want.
-Dan
rying to defend them?
-Dan
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019, Michael Thomas wrote:
But right you are, it's ultimately the carrier who needs to care about this
problem at or nothing gets better.
either the carrier starts dealing with it or legislation will come down to
force the issue.
-Dan
Amazon, you really should know better.
Source ip: 54.240.4.4
https://search.arin.net/rdap/?query=54.240.4.4
Source Registry ARIN
Kind Group
Full Name Amazon SES Abuse
Handle ASA152-ARIN
Email email-ab...@amazon.com
RCPT To:
<<< 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.
550 5.1.1 ... User unknown
DATA
<
"User unknown" is pretty clear.
But whatever.
-Dan
On Mon, 29 Jul 2019, Mel Beckman wrote:
Dan,
I don’t really have the time to parse the debug output you sent. If you want
me, or most others, to pay attention to your post, please provide a more
detailed explanation of what t
e by unplugging or suppressing
forums/platforms that really don't closely match the actual ideology of the
shooters.
those who perform political curation of content are at risk of losing
their section 230 protections.
archive.fo/zOUBG
if you really want this to happen, go ahead and "remove racism out of
internet". you won't like the result.
-Dan
eems the only way to wake them up.
-Dan
ioned a 70% increase in traffic to Akamai
> which seems to correlate with a new Fortnite release
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610email: dwh...@mybtc.com
http://www.btcbroadband.com
The verge is garbage. That is all.
-Dan
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Keith Medcalf wrote:
Bwahahahaha!
It is internally inconsistent. Perhaps this is just shoddy reporting,
or perhaps the whole thing is just someone's idea of a wet dream.
"The line will begin in North Pole, Alaska and w
pi's, but the downfall is they don't have
SFP ports. I'm looking for something that's portable and easy to configure and
drop in. Thanks.
~Nick
--
Checked by SOPHOS http://www.sophos.com
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)
Fact is the telcos make lots of money off spoofed robocalls so they have
zero incentive to stop the practice.
-Dan
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, Keith Medcalf wrote:
"CallerID" is a misnomer. It is actually the "Advertized ID". However, the
telco's realized you
ivate them is prison terms.
financial penalties will be ignored.
-Dan
On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Mike Hammett wrote:
So send them all to Lenny?
I wish there was a phone app to do this.
-Dan
Nothing.
It is extremely cheap, extremely durable, and nearly 100% recyclable. All
the things lithium is not.
The only thing is lead acid is not power dense, but that is not generally
a problem at sites.
-Dan
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
What is wrong with lead acid
Great explanation!
Remember that LECs (Local Exchange Carrier, CenturyLink, Verizon, etc.)
typically get to decide how this all works...
ATT is still an 800 pound gorilla and a couple years ago stopped ALL
payments to CLECs (Competitive Local Exchange Carrier, buy wholesale
from LECs), took th
Please contact me off list regarding a geolocation error.
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610email: dwh...@olp.net
http://www.btcbroadband.com
.
We are running Datacenter and having 2000 and more clients. they are hosted
their Network devices.
--
With Regards,
Sathish Ippani
9177166040
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610email: dwh...@olp.net
http
nd/or residential).
I am aware that there are some CALEA requirements of ISPs that seem to kick
in once a CALEA request is made, but is that different from a license.
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Yes, but depends on HW. They support some pretty huge environments.
You have to have "enough" IOPs to keep up with the polling, DB and RRD data.
Then there will never be a "heavy" load...
I would contact them and based on your needs ask them what HW you will
need for your implementation.
You can
you can
define your security policies, and don't need crazy throughput on your VPN,
Meraki is the way to go. Be careful though: they have to be continually
licensed to work and can get pretty expensive if you go for the higher end
gear. Thus far, we've been able to stick to the cheape
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, b...@theworld.com wrote:
There isn't even general agreement on whether (or what!) Cloudfare is
doing is a problem.
aiding and abetting. at the very least willful negligence.
-Dan
Please contact me off list.
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610email: dwh...@olp.net
http://www.btcbroadband.com
Are there any products you're using which are dedicated to responding to
customer facing pings?
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610email: dwh...@olp.net
http://www.btcbroadband.com
wrote:
Can you elaborate?
On Sep 9, 2016 2:54 PM, "Dan White" wrote:
Are there any products you're using which are dedicated to responding to
customer facing pings?
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610
ually have an abuse mailbox that doesn't bounce outright.
-Dan
when they get SBL'd though!
Lightning quick.
-Dan
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Dan Hollis wrote:
not so much malice as gross incompetence.
running spamfilters on your abuse@ mailbox, really? that is, for those which
actually have an abuse mailbox that doesn't bounce outright.
Sorry about that,
Quoting Jose Gerardo Perales Soto :
We've recently experienced a traffic increase on the NTP queries to
NTP pool project (pool.ntp.org) servers. One theory is that some
service provider NTP infraestructure failed approximately 2 days ago
and traffic is now being redirected to servers belongi
Quoting Roland Dobbins :
Do you have flow telemetry, which provides a lot more information
than basic pps/bps stats?
Sources are pretty widely spread out among cell networks/home
internet, seem to be mostly US based. I'm not seeing a large amount
of traffic per single IP or single subnet.
Quoting David :
I found devices doing lookups for all of these at the same time
{0,0.uk,0.us,asia,europe,north-america,south-america,oceania,africa,europe}.pool.ntp.org and then it proceeds to use everything returned, which explains why everyone is seeing an
increase.
I'm very interested to
Quoting David :
On 2016-12-19 1:55 PM, Jan Tore Morken wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 01:32:50PM -0700, David wrote:
I found devices doing lookups for all of these at the same time
{0,0.uk,0.us,asia,europe,north-america,south-america,oceania,africa}.pool.ntp.org
and then it proceeds to use ever
d: 451 Could not complete sender verify callout
<<< 503-All RCPT commands were rejected with this error:
<<< 503-Could not complete sender verify callout
<<< 503 Valid RCPT command must precede DATA
Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours
Will keep trying until message is 5 days old
-Dan
on it.
Actually, due to treaty, it is. At least according to some lawyers that have
been advising ICANN stakeholder group(s).
can treaties supercede US law?
-Dan
.
-Dan
to use a crowdsourced legal toolkit given the risks
of a violation? would you?
-Dan
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20180527_icann_files_legal_action_against_domain_registrar_whois_data/
-Dan
On Thu, 31 May 2018, b...@theworld.com wrote:
FWIW a German court has just ruled against ICANN's injunction and in
favor of Tucows/EPAG.
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-4-2018-05-30-en
Welcome to contact-free whois?
-Dan
ement access.
It might be desirable to provide enough contact information to mitigate
issues before it has to end up in the hands of law enforcement.
black hats and bullet proof hosting are definitely going to enjoy using
gdpr to hide behind though.
-Dan
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
"we are not the internet police" right? (
Indeed. Aid and abet would be a more accurate description.
-Dan
We've found that running windows in safe mode produces better results with
Ookla. And MACs usually do better as well. We've gotten >900mb/s with those
two approaches.
On 07/16/18 17:58 +, Chris Gross wrote:
I'm curious what people here have found as a good standard for providing solid
speed
rican Express
To: americanexpr...@aep.com
Subject: Act Now: Information About your Cardmember Account.
-Dan
can we please just stop this nonsense?
ip under your direct control originates sewage. you should accept reports as-is.
requiring victims of your sewage to go through special contortions to
report it to you is not acceptable.
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
I'm saying people who filter their abuse mailboxes need to stop doing so.
-Dan
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, Mel Beckman wrote:
Dan,
Are you saying Nanog if spamming you? It's not at all clear what your complaint
is.
-mel via cell
On Jul 24, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Brian Kantor wrote:
O
Are there any DirecTV Now contacts on-list? We are having geolocation
trouble with a well established ip range.
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610email: dwh...@mybtc.com
http://www.btcbroadband.com
My wife and I, both on AT&T iPhones in the greater Cleveland area, received
nothing. A co-worker of mine in Virginia got an alert, another in Texas did
not. I believe the co-workers are both on AT&T.
I can't speak for the co-workers, but my wife and I do not have wifi calling
Maybe Amazon will do something cool with 3.1.33.7 ...
dan
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, at 8:30 PM, Todd Underwood wrote:
> google used 4.4.4.4 for DNS in the past (2010, IIRC).
>
> t
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:21 PM Steve Meuse wrote:
>>
>> I think it was the dial
We have 10G IPv4 circuits with both Zayo and Cogent getting full routes.
One major difference is the maintenance windows - when Cogent has
maintenance, things get weird for hours at a time.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 4:00 PM JASON BOTHE via NANOG
wrote:
> If you love yourself and your organization
Contact some DNSBLs? Sometimes it takes 550 responses to all their smtp
connections for them to wake up from their slumber.
-Dan
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018, David Shaw wrote:
Hi,
I could really use some help reaching someone at Oracle for a spam problem
coming from 129.145.16.122. I've
r
>> country basis?
>>
>> You want to know how big the per-country customer cones for each AS are?
>> Like, for a given country, what AS has the most down-stream networks within
>> that country? We used to generate those stats, but the code has probably
>> broken long ago.
>>
>> We did it because we had bulk data agreements with all five RIRs, so we
>> had the ASes databased by country-code. We still have that part up-to-date.
>>
>> -Bill
>>
>>
>> --
> Mehmet
> +1-424-298-1903
>
>
--
Dan Bateyko
https://dbateyko.info
be careful what you wish for...
--dan
On 12/5/2018 10:24 AM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
Hi there
I am looking to buy juniper qfx and some dwdm gear to be shipped
overseas (indonesia, thailand, colombia, chile...)
I am looking to see if therr are any preferred hardware resellers
people would
faster than you're getting with T1.
You might consider setting up wireless repeaters to bridge where there is
no direct LOS. Look at what the hamwan guys have done. http://hamwan.org/
-Dan
I doubt he will get >1.5mbps with those over a 6 mile long connection.
I did a quick check and flowpoint 2200s seem to max out at 192kbps at 3
miles.
-Dan
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Tim Pozar wrote:
For dry pairs, I have used Flowpoint SDSL modems (see attached). I
picked these up for a sawb
Repeaters are standard for T1s.
I strongly suggest looking at wireless. There is almost guaranteed to be a
spot you can put a repeater up to bridge you to your gateway.
-Dan
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Nick Bogle wrote:
The driving distance is 4 miles, we are leasing it from CenturyLink whose
Yes, someone needs to forcefully remove this subscription:
Subject: Re: Your message to lem...@yahoo-inc.com (was: Re: Extending network
over a dry pair)
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
Is anyone else receiving the "Your message to REDACTED (was: $oldSubject)"
auto-respon
https://twitter.com/archiveis/status/1081276424781287427
Wonder what tactic the hijackers are using, and if it would work with any
registrar - or if there is something specific about isnic that allows it
to happen.
-Dan
information for that mailing list,
please?
- Brian
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610email: dwh...@mybtc.com
http://www.btcbroadband.com
If there is a representative from OneAmerica here, please contact me
off-list.
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610email: dwh...@mybtc.com
http://www.btcbroadband.com
ring a bit about your intended use case?Warm regards,-Dan Sneddon
. security admins).-Dan SneddonOn Feb 27, 2024, at 10:05 AM, Javier Gutierrez wrote:
Thanks to you all for your answers, it has helped me a lot already.
My design is very simplistic, I have 2 sets of firewalls that I will have advertising a /32 unicast to the network at each location and it will
Nope, almost certainly a bad actor who has registered a similar-sounding domain
name in advance of launching some sort of cyberattack.
-DXS
> On Mar 7, 2024, at 2:08 PM, Mark Foster wrote:
>
>
> Subdomain of a Microsoft domain name associated with a Microsoft product?
> Microsoft would be
Why aren't _ALL_ consumer privacy regulations managed by the FTC?
Why is the FCC needed here?
-Dan
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
On Mar 29, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Joe Loiacono wrote:
Lowering barriers to entry is where the next political focus should be.
Joe Loiacono
A competent earthlink abuse contact please?
I am getting the runaround from people who are unable to read headers.
-Dan
1 - 100 of 398 matches
Mail list logo
