8:0:B::BEEF source-address 2001:DB8:YZ01::1
S 2001:DB8:YZ00:3F00::/56 [1/0]
via FE80::4665:7FFF:FE14:EDC2, VlanXXXX
Chris Gross
Network Architect
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Brandon Price
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 9:01 PM
To: nanog list
Subject: IPv6 Prefix Delegation to cust
Does anyone have a contact from Finish Line/JD Sports or someone that can
resolve a block issue reach out to me please? Seems my whole AS is being
blocked by their configured Akamai filtering.
Chris Gross
Got a contact, delisted and found a local contact we had too, thank you
everyone.
Chris Gross
NineStar Connect
From: NANOG on behalf of
Chris Gross
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 4:22 PM
To: nanog list
Subject: Finish Line/JD Sports Contact
Does anyone have a
Biggest issue I've seen is it may work on some Cisco models and not others. I
got their flashing box to just reflash the firmware and that has fixed even
"dead" optics.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Nicholas Warren
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 8:32 AM
To: nanog@nanog.o
I'm curious what people here have found as a good standard for providing solid
speedtest results to customers. All our techs have Dell laptops of various
models, but we always hit 100% CPU when doing a Ookla speedtest for a server we
have on site. So then if you have a customer paying for 600M o
initely look at it as a replacement for later.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Erculiani
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 2:17 PM
To: Chris Gross
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: Proving Gig Speed
We use Iperf3 for customers that complain about throughput,
Im going with the corporate greed/free labor angle. Perhaps they need more
training data for their cars and figure a couple small ISP/businesses worth of
people is worth flipping over temporarily?
This email has been sent from my phone. Please excuse any brevity, typos, or
lack of formality.
__
How to deploy with Zhone is to put it in the garbage. I have more than enough
horror stories from the provider side of things and enough of their TAC
literally screaming at me because I called out of regular hours how my problems
are physical fiber issues when it never is. They’ve also caused an
For a lot of us, PONs are a way of life and may not even have any 100G capable
devices in our network, muchless enough to make our money on. While you may be
so "lucky" to "never really take it seriously", it is supporting hundreds of
thousands, if not millions, of homes in the US.
PON is the l
For managing them, do you use the actual software they ship with it? When I
last checked, it requires a MSSQL instance with hard coded “sa” user access
which was an immediate no go for me. I still have them sitting in a box in our
lab as a teaching aid really.
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Michel B
I feel the issue here is people are already paying for support contracts and
vendors to come on site. Now there's the additional incurred cost for remote
hands to handle it.
If it's a situation where it's replacing a person of my internal staff to act
on it, sure. But if I'm paying Dell to come
Is there anyone from Craigslist here or anyone have a better way to deal with
their blocks? There's a contact e-mail in the block messages when trying to
visit, but there's never gets a response back when we try it. Please hit me up
off list.
I utilize A10 CGNAT that allows dynamic NAT logging, since we're in a similar
boat of utilization.
This email has been sent from my phone. Please excuse any brevity, typos, or
lack of formality.
From: Aaron Gould
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 12:54
To: 'Micha
That sounds like a provider problem with their configuration most likely. I run
hundreds of 844E, 844Gs and have one at my house even, and it continues out
fine for 1.1.1.1 when I was testing over the weekend with our config.
Chris Gross
IP Services Supervisor
-Original Message-
From
14 matches
Mail list logo
