On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Chadwick Sorrell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm sending a new MAINT-AS object to the db-ad...@altdb.net, but it
> doesn't appear to be in the database after a few weeks. Are there any
> requirements that I may be missing on my new request, or some sort of
> way I can help
> I had a vague concept of IRR before this thread, and have researched
> them as a result of it. They seem quite useful. I didn't know anything
> about RPKI before this thread. I'm looking into that now.
>
> So I don't think ARIN should spend it's limited resources on anything to
> do with it's cop
Just to make something clear.I do not own any stock, interest or
have any official relationship with Verizon or Cogent. The
opinions expressed are mine and mine alone as I have come to
understand some of the relationship without the aid of any privileged
information.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:39 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:59:43 -0400, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:
> > > On Apr 28, 2014, at 19:41, Chris Boyd wrote:
> > > I'm in the middle of a physical move. I promise I'll take the 3
> deagg'd
> > > /24s out as soon as I can.
> > Do not laugh. If ever
> If Netflix continues on its current course, ALL ISPs -- not just rural ones,
> will eventually be forced to rebel. And it will not be pretty.
I call hogwash.ALL ISPs are in the business of providing access to
the Internet.If you feel the need to rebel, then I suggest you
look at creative
> But regardless of the financial arrangements, such a connection doesn't
> require an ASN or BGP. In fact, it doesn't even require a registered IP
> address at either end! A simple Ethernet connection (or a leased line of any
> kind, in fact; it could just as well be a virtual circuit) and a stati
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Brett Glass wrote:
> Perhaps it's best to think of it this way: I'm outsourcing some backbone
> routing functions to my upstreams, which (generously) aren't charging me
> anything extra to do it. In my opinion, that's a good business move.
Last comment on the thr
Joe,
That's not entirely true.You can easily do lookup for
whoami.akamai.net and it will return the unicast address for the node
in question (provided the local resolver is able to do the
resolution).This is a frequent lookup that I do when I don't know
what actual anycast node I'm us
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I have a small question and was wondering if someone could help me with
> that.
>
> Question is - why companies like Google, Amazon are having partial
> anycasting in CDN setups? E.g if we pick a random hostname from url of
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> I don't think a muni can prevent the ILEC from installing fiber in their
> RoW
First off, IANAL, Secondly, I've had a reasonable amount of experience
with Village and Municipal Law.In short, the statement above is
incorrect, in so muc
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Eric Wieling wrote:
> This is an example of what is really wrong. The install tech usually does a
> good job (there are exceptions, of course), but then the outside plant people
> drop the ball.
>
> I appreciate it when a repair or install tech does whatever is
You can also verify the object configurations from another IRRd, such
as Level(3)
whois -h filtergen.level3.net "RADB::YOUR-AS-SET
-searchpath=RIPE;ARIN;RADB -recurseok -warnonly"
You can limit the searchpath to just include RADB if you wish, but
it's good to know what else is out there.
charles
Take a look:
https://www.arin.net/resources/routing/
charles
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Brandon Wade wrote:
>
>
>>> For a newbie, how does one go about learning the basic's of IRRd.
>
> That pretty much sums it up. I feel like I'm stuck reading RFC's that are too
> overly complex for so
I've been involved in IX renumbering efforts because exchange(s)
decided to use /25's instead of /24's.It's painful because
troubleshooting can be a little difficult as differing subnetmasks are
in play. If you have the address space, use a /24.ARIN has IPv4
address space specifically res
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
> What are the main difference between these two peering companies,
> exchanges, and overall operating model? The market in question would be
> Dallas Texas where Equinix already has the only established peering
> exchange with over 100 members,
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:29 PM, LEdouard Louis wrote:
> Optimum Online business only offer 5 static IP address.
Correct, this is a business grade cable modem service, where the only
allocation they will provide is a /29. But what do you expect for a
triple play residential product for ~150/mont
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:35 AM, Paul Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 1. Neither Sprint nor Cogent have transit
>> Both Sprint & Cogent are transit-free networks. (Notice how I carefully
>> avoided saying "tier one"?
>> Does Akamai have peering arrangements with Cogent directly?
>
> Akamai are self declared peering sluts. So, yes, they have direct
> peering arrangements with Cogent.
Hrm, so after I posted this, I looked a bit deeper into it and found:
3 vl3493.mpd03.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.5.22
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Campbell, Alex
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> We have recently brought up some BGP sessions with a new provider, and
> have found that we can get end to end connectivity through the new
> provider to pretty much everywhere except networks behind AT&T (A
> What I am looking for is a best practice guide on community policy setup.
>
> Barring that, I plan to continue examining every publicly published
> guideline to try to produce one, but likely as not it will suffer from the
> all to common human failing of shortsightedness.
Feel free to look at o
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 1:13 PM, tt tt wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> We are looking to move our non infrastructure routes into iBGP to help with
> our IGP scalability (OSPF). We already run full BGP tables on our core where
> we connect to multiple upstream and downstream customers. Most of our
> a
On 10/22/07, Alexander Harrowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >MSO's typically understand this as eyeball heavy content
> >retrieval, not content generation
>
> I was under the impression Comcast advertised Internet access, which
> is read/write. Clearly I was mistaken...
This is correct,
Greetings,
Earlier today, I was tying to determine what local preferences
Sprint uses within their network for peers vs customers ... Long
story short, their Looking Glass only allows for:
ping
traceroute
bgp dampened
bgp flap-statistics
But not 'bgp X.X.X.X' which can be quite fr
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Chris Wallace
wrote:
>This isn't the first time we have seen this issue with our various providers,
>how can I prevent issues like this from happening in the future?
Quick question, are you running with a default route from your
provider? If so, you're better o
24 matches
Mail list logo
