On 11/17/10 9:22 AM, chip wrote:
> There's been lots of discussion on how we should allocate space to various
> bits of the network. What I haven't yet seen is how people are tracking
> these allocations. Is everyone using one of the two or three commercial
> applications or some OSS solution or
If you are using BIND, take a look at:
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01000
cv
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
>
> I noticed some issues on one of DNS server I am managing. It was getting
> queries for couple of attacking domains and server was replying
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01000
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
> I think is better idea to rate-limit your responses rather than
> limiting the size of them.
>
> AFAIK, bind has a way to do it.
>
> .as
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Anurag Bhatia
> wrote:
> >
check out our Network Documentation Tool:
http://netdot.uoregon.edu
--
=========
Carlos Vicente Tel: +1(541) 346-1763
Network EngineerFax: +1(541) 346-4397
Information ServicesPGP ID : 8623D9
sers and assign
different levels of permissions to the cacti interface.
# Permissions can be specified per-graph for each user, making cacti
suitable for co location situations.
# Each user can keep their own graph settings for varying viewing preferences.
cv
--
======
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Our Network Documentation Tool [1] can generate DNS records for each
device interface with an IP address.
[1] https://netdot.uoregon.edu
[2]
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/presentations/Tuesday/Vicente-netdot-presentation-nanog49.pdf
cv
Dikk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> One problem, too, with these tools is that they often collect duplicate
> information. It would be nice to have some common collector/store so
> that other tools can pull the information out of that store. Why have
> three different tools querying
10feb/20100203-vincente.pdf
Feedback welcome.
Regards,
Carlos Vicente
University of Oregon
8 matches
Mail list logo
