Hi,
Shouldn't that be solved...?
Maybe a task-force under NRO...? :-)
Regards,
Carlos
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Job Snijders wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:52:05PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
perchance is RDAP implemented by all RIRs?
Yes, but in 5 slightly different ways :-)
Kind regards
Hi All,
Did this issue resurface some days ago...?
I had nearly 6000 ROAs on June 1st.
That went to ZERO on June 2nd.
I'm using routinator. Should i have changed something in my config to
accomodate for some change?
Best Regards,
Carlos
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022, Cedrick Adrien Mbeyet wrote:
all still works without any extra configuration in Routinator.
Well, for me it's still not really working yet :-)
Thanks anyway.
Cheers,
Carlos
Cheers,
Alex
On 14 Jun 2023, at 15:15, Carlos Friaças via NANOG wrote:
Hi All,
Did this issue resurface some days ago...?
I had near
Greetings,
My issue seems to be solved.
It seems the Afrinic glitch is incompatible with the version of routinator
i was using. So i updated to the last version (0.12.1), and now i can get
Afrinic's ROAs again :-)
Thanks Alex and Cedrick!
Best Regards,
Carlos
Hi,
Just to let everybody know that a petition was started in order to try
to enable a policy discussion about "BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy
Violation".
If you would like to read the proposal, it is available at:
https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/proposals/2019/ARIN_prop_266_v2/
D
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Matt Harris wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:28 AM Carlos Friaças via NANOG
wrote:
Hi,
Just to let everybody know that a petition was started in order to try
to enable a policy discussion about "BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy
Viol
Hi,
(please see inline)
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Matt Harris wrote:
(...)
As far as expanding roles goes... Over the past few decades, we've all watched as
the internet became less and less "wild wild
west" and more and more controlled (sometimes centrally, sometimes in a more or
less decentr
Hi Everyone,
Just a gentle reminder that May 1st is the last day to express
support for this Open Petition at ARIN's Public Policy Mailing List
(arin-ppml).
Best Regards,
Carlos
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Carlos Friaças via NANOG wrote:
Hi,
Just to let everybody know that a petitio
Hi Job, All,
It relies *exclusively* on "RIPE RIS Live", or does it also use other
sources?
Regards,
Carlos
On Wed, 15 May 2019, Job Snijders wrote:
Hi,
I recognise the issue you describe, and I'd like to share with you that
we're going down another road. Nowadays, RIPE NCC offers a str
AS15001 ?
(IT Convergence Inc.)
MSP in India: did they have any slightest idea about the issue? :-)
Cheers,
Carlos
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019, Philip Lavine via NANOG wrote:
I talked to the upstream provider on AS 1500. I called the telephone number on
the abuse record on ARIN and it went to a
Hi,
(Also never been in Australia, unfortunately...)
Netname is "PMANET":
...isn't it OK to assume it could stand for "Port of Melbourne Authority
Network"?
* pma.vic.gov.au is not operational
(i wonder what can be found with passive dns)
* vic.gov.au is still operational.
Quick googling
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:46 PM Martijn Schmidt via NANOG
wrote:
Hi Elad,
Is this policy officially documented by AFRINIC somewhere? Can you make route
objects for legacy AFRINIC resources in their RIR operated IRRDB as a fallback
for RPKI?
Best regards,
Martijn _
Hi All,
There is this blogpost from the FIRST netsec-sig group, about this topic,
available at
https://www.first.org/blog/20231222-Is-the-LoA-DoA-for-Routing
I totally agree with Christopher. The above blogpost ends with (for those
who don't like to follow links):
"With the current leve
Hi,
(please see inline)
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Tom Samplonius wrote:
There is one purpose: to facilitate IP fraud, and maintain currently
fraudulently routed IPs.
Yes!
Anyone can dummy up a LOA. And there is still quite a lot of unrouted
IP space.
Yes. But the endgame is not alway
14 matches
Mail list logo
