This is principally addressed to Internet Service Providers (ISPs),
including those that do not yet support IPv6, and to Content
Providers.
Original Message
Subject: [v6ops] RFC 6343 on Advisory Guidelines for 6to4 Deployment
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 20:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: rfc-
On 2011-08-11 12:45, james machado wrote:
> what is the life expectancy of IPv6? It won't live forever and we
> can't reasonably expect it too. I understand we don't want run out of
> addresses in the next 10-40 years but what about 100? 200? 300?
>
> We will run out and our decedents will go t
Eugen,
On 2011-08-11 21:53, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 01:52:10PM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
>> Well, we know that the human population will stabilise somewhere below
>> ten billion by around 2050. The current unicast space provides for about
>
&g
Bill,
On 2010-07-22 19:49, William Herrin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines
>>> There is a third major challenge to dual-stack that isn't addressed in
>>> the document: differing network security mod
Hi,
Sheng Jiang (Huawei) and Brian Carpenter (University of Auckland, research
consultant to Huawei) are currently running a questionnaire on IPv6 deployment,
addressed to every ISP. The purpose is to provide facts for a document about
deployment scenarios that we are drafting for discussion in th
On 2011-02-26 10:34, bill manning wrote:
> The IANA function was split?
RFC 2860 already did that. It seems to work well.
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/frnotices/2011/fr_ianafunctionsnoi_02252011.pdf
I'm glad to see they are up to date:
"Paper submissions should
include a three and one-half inch
com
6 matches
Mail list logo
