On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 04:46, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Oct 20, 2010, at 10:28 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> If your big enough to get your own GUA and have the dollars to get
>> it routed then do that. If you are forced to use PA (think home
>> networks) then having a ULA prefix as well is a good
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 00:58, David Conrad wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2010, at 6:42 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
>>> My guess is that the millions of residential users will be less and
>>> less enthused with (pure) PA each time they change service providers...
>> That claim seems to be unsupported by curre
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 22:40, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> Probably a case of something being blindingly obvious but...
>
> I have seen plenty of information on IPv6 from a internal network
> standpoint. I have seen very little with respect to how a ISP is supposed
> to handle routing to residential c
On Jun 14, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Then use RA and move on. However, please understand that yours
> is not the only environment and that there are real-world scenarios
> where having the router-guys dictate the host configuration is considered
> unacceptable at best.
This has alway
On Jun 14, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 02:00:35PM -0400, Ben Jencks
> wrote:
>> This has always confused me. What aspect of host configuration is the router
>> providing that's so problematic? The prefix, wh
On Nov 2, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Matt Chung wrote:
> I work for a regional ISP and very recently there has been an influx of
> calls reporting "slowness" when accessing certain websites (i.e
> google.com/voice/b) via HTTP. After performing a tcpdump and analyzing the
> session, I have been able to pin
On 11/27/2012 11:19 AM, Dale W. Carder wrote:
> Thus spake Dobbins, Roland (rdobb...@arbor.net) on Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at
> 03:16:27PM +:
>>
>> On Nov 27, 2012, at 9:50 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>
>>> the cause is netflix and youtube, with a bit of help from fb and
>>> non-youtube gobble.
>>
>>
On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> I started monitoring IPv6 access to www.netflix.com after seeing this
> posting
> (http://www.personal.psu.edu/dvm105/blogs/ipv6/2012/06/netflix-is-back.html)
> and what I found, over the week, was that access was coming and going
> (www.premieronli
On Jun 21, 2012, at 12:15 PM, AP NANOG wrote:
> What if, and I am brainstorming here, what if there was a hardware device
> which plugged in via USB. It was programed (i.e verified) in person, such as
> a key signing party. The serial number of the hardware device was all that
> is stored in
hey were in the original table,
including the full AS-path, communities, etc? If Quagga/OpenBGPD
aren't the right tools, I'm happy to use something else.
This seems like it would be a pretty standard thing to do, but none of
the tools I've found seem aimed at this sort of testbed.
Thanks!
-Ben Jencks
2010/1/12 Łukasz Bromirski :
> On 2010-01-12 21:27, Ben Jencks wrote:
>> This is obviously a rookie question, but I haven't found anything by
>> searching. I'm looking to set up a small testbed to simulate our
>> internal network topology, and I want to have a reali
On Apr 21, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Ben Whorwood wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Can anyone share any thoughts or experiences for VPN links running over slow
> Internet connections, typically 2kB/s - 3kB/s (think 33.6k modem)?
>
> We are looking into utilising OpenVPN for out-of-office workers who would be
>
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 16:59, Romain Boissat wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 01:53:51PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I'm honestly not sure, but, check RFCs:
>>
>> 3315 (OPTION_RELAY_MSG)
>> 4580 (Relay Agent Subscriber-ID)
>> 5007 (Various LQ related Options, including OPTION_LQ
13 matches
Mail list logo
