Even if the first numbers were correctly calculated, they don't allow
for further deaggregation of already advertised prefixes, which
shouldn't be underestimated as the commercial value of each address
increases...
On 10.06.2014 06:17, Bryan Tong wrote:
I botched those numbers.
Let me fix.
As for migration to another OS, I find FreeBSD better as a matter of
network performance. The last time I checked OpenBSD was either
lacking or was in the early stages of multiple cores support.
If you do decide to go the FreeBSD route (you can run openbgpd on
FreeBSD if you like), check out th
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:17:32 +0900, Masataka Ohta
wrote:
>draft-ohta-urlsrv-00.txt
>
>DNS SRV RRs of a domain implicitly specify servers and port numbers
>corresponding to the domain.
>
>By combining URLs and SRV RRs, no port numbers have to be specified
>explicitly in URLs,
;s not) or the address is
dynamic (it's not).
Thanks,
Andrew Jones
Daraco Services
Hi All,
Does anyone have a copy of the DDoS detection plugin for NFSen called ddd
that they could send to me?
According to a blog article [1] I read, it used to be available at [2].
It's not there, and I haven't had any luck trying to track it down the
usual ways. If anyone is able to provide a cop
Plugin
>
> I have not submitted a request for it but if you happen to come accross
> this plugin, I would be interested.
>
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:55:21PM +1000, Andrew Jones wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> Does anyone have a copy of the DDoS detection plugin for NFSen calle
Downloads work fine for me, looks like something's changing forward
slashes to backslashes in the download URL for you... Try these links:
http://sharontools.com/Products/Download/Mass%20config%20v1.8.rar
http://sharontools.com/Products/Download/MassConfig%20v1.8%20-%20User%20manual.pdf
-Jonesy
It's widely accepted that you only advertise your peers' routes to
customers, and you only advertise your own, and your customers' routes
to your upstreams.
On 07.11.2012 15:48, Jian Gu wrote:
What do you mean hijack? Google is peering with Moratel, if Google
does not
want Moratel to advertise
It looks like nLayer have routes learned through Moratel which have
local-pref set to anywhere up to 250 (learned from private peers), while
the routes learned from direct peering relationships to Google on public
peering have a local-pref of 200. This explains why the routes from
Moratel would
Hi Dave,
Try this page, linked from the google help page you referenced:
https://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=81126&rd=1
Hope that helps
Andrew
On 22.11.2012 13:29, Dave Sotnick wrote:
Thanks Matthew. Sadly, most of the bounce responses have URLs that
point you to a help p
This all becomes even more complicated when some traffic isn't counted
(Eg. "free facebook") on a given service which generally then
necessitates the need for some level of flow-based accounting, even if
it's just collecting flows for the free traffic to subtract from the
port counters. I can s
http://www.laser2000.de/out/media/glimmerglass_system_100%281%29.pdf
On 10.12.2014 10:21, Arnold Nipper wrote:
I'm looking for a modular, cost-effective automatic / intelligent
fibre
optic patch panel.
I'm not looking at these photonic x-connects, but really for
something
which does the patc
It reads to me like it's not a separate Wi-Fi radio on a different
channel, but just an additional SSID being broadcast:
http://wifi.comcast.com/faqs.html
ctrl+f "Does the new Home Hotspot impact my Internet speeds or data
usage?"
On 11.12.2014 14:55, Phil Bedard wrote:
It won't overlap with
Is there a multi-tennant capable UTM from Sophos? Or are you using a vm
instance per customer?
Thanks,
Andrew
On 17.08.2015 16:47, Colin Johnston wrote:
sophos utm works great :)
Colin
On 17 Aug 2015, at 05:56, Rakesh M wrote:
I have seen one of our customers using Sophos and they are
rel
It depends on the software used and implementation.
Many rulesets for pf on BSD start with 'block in on interfaceX' for
instance, because it uses a "last match wins" system, unless you use the
'quick' keyword to make rule processing stop if that rule matches.
Andrew
On 07.05.2015 08:30, Scott
On 16.08.2013 12:46, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Brandon Martin"
As to why people wouldn't put them behind dedicated firewalls,
imagine
something like a single-server colo scenario. Most such providers
don't
offer any form of lights-out management aside from mayb
On 11.12.2013 17:11, Nick Cameo wrote:
Sir whatever that is an acronym for, you have my undivided.
This is going to make for an interesting thread in about 6 hours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadband_Remote_Access_Server
Michael J McCafferty wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 18:38 -0700, sean head wrote:
Nathan Ward wrote:
On 18/06/2009, at 1:31 PM, Michael J McCafferty wrote:
All,
I'd be OK if we were in a facility that was only average in terms of
noise, but we are not. I need an exceptional p
18 matches
Mail list logo
