Dear all,
We have built a tool that checks the visibility of IPv4 prefixes at the
interdomain level.
The tool is available at *http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/* and you can use
it to retrieve the Limited Visibility Prefixes (LVPs) (i.e., prefixes
that are not present in all the global routing tab
f all this info is
there ?
/-- /
/*Jason Hellenthal*/
IS&T Services Professional
Inbox: /jhellent...@dataix.net <mailto:jhellent...@dataix.net>/
JJH48-ARIN
On May 15, 2013, at 6:22, Andra Lutu <mailto:andra.l...@imdea.org>> wrote:
Dear all,
We have built a tool
Hi all,
I am working on getting a better grasp on what data we
have in the RIS project from RIPE.
To this end, I am checking the
export policies of the ASes peering with RIPE AS12654 at different
IXPs.
I am wondering if anybody knows what these ASes actually
announce to the RIPE repositories?
Hi Randy,
Thank you for your reply.
I do, however, have
one more question, please find it bellow.
>> In some
cases I saw the export policy ANNOUNCE ANY, is this consistent
>> with a particular AS behaving like the RIPE AS was its
customer?
>
> well, if i was to take that literally, that
woul
Hi,
From public routing data we can see a total of 2,419 /25s prefixes
announced from at least one of the monitors active in RIPE RIS and
RouteViews.
None of the /25s are actually advertised by all these monitors i.e. the
/25s reach some but not all the ASes which take part in these projects.
Dear all,
In November 2012 we have released the *BGP Visibility Scanner*, a tool
that checks the visibility of IPv4 prefixes at the interdomain level.
We are now happy to further make available the *visibility query for
IPv6 prefixes*.
Back in February 2013 we have presented the BGP Visibilit
6 matches
Mail list logo