Re: BGP and The zero window edge

2021-04-22 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:24:54AM +0200, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote: [...] > > Another one is > http://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_detail/lg01/ipv6?q=2a0b:6b86:d24::/48 > > 2a0b:6b86:d24::/48 via: > BGP.as_path: 201701 9002 6939 42615 212232 > BGP.as_path: 34927 9002 6939

Re: russian prefixes

2021-07-29 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 02:29:19PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-cuts-self-off-from-global-internet-tests-defenses-rbc-2021-7 > says "Russia disconnected itself from the rest of the internet, a test > of its new defense from cyber warfare, report says" > > did t

Re: Prefix 120.29.240.0/21

2010-11-17 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:19:55AM +0100, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: > We see a number of session towards downstreams flaps obviously caused by > prefix 120.29.240.0/21, originated by AS45158, transited by AS4739 (see > below). The same here, but in my case we're downstream itself :) JunOS logs:

Re: bgp update destroying transit on redback routers ?

2011-12-01 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:07:15PM +0100, Igor Ybema wrote: > Hi there, > Since about 15:00u GMT we receive bgp updates from our transit which > destroys the bgp sessions with them with message: > > send NOTIFICATION: 3/9 (update: optional attribute error) with 11 byte > data. mxReadMs=610 > > We

Re: bgp update destroying transit on redback routers ?

2011-12-02 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:56:43PM -0500, Jeff Tantsura wrote: > Hi, > > Let me take it over from now on, I'm the IP Routing/MPLS Product Manager > at Ericsson responsible for all routing protocols. > There's nothing wrong in checking ASN in AGGREGATOR, we don't really want > see ASN 0 anywhere,

Re: Unwanted Traffic Removal Service (UTRS)

2014-10-08 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:42:38PM +0200, Job Snijders wrote: > > There are various flavors at the moment in terms of validation (please > correct me if I am wrong): The Polish blackholing project only allows > blackholes which fall within the set of prefixes which an ASN > originates, the DE-CIX

Fw: new message

2015-10-24 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
Hey! New message, please read <http://cakecompanybyvee.co.za/only.php?gb> Alexandre Snarskii

Fw: new message

2015-10-24 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
Hey! New message, please read <http://shophorseplay.com/need.php?s087i> Alexandre Snarskii

Fw: new message

2015-10-24 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
Hey! New message, please read <http://www.autler-kfz.at/any.php?7g> Alexandre Snarskii

Fw: new message

2015-10-25 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
Hey! New message, please read <http://lilouconnect.com/hope.php?n> Alexandre Snarskii

Re: nLayer IP transit

2013-08-01 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 09:13:59AM +0300, Saku Ytti wrote: > On (2013-08-01 10:00 +1000), Mark Tees wrote: > > > I remember reading a while back that customers of nLayer IP transit > > services could send in Flowspec rules to nLayer. Anyone know if that is > > true/current? > > Anyone planning to

Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

2010-04-20 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 06:56:43AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Franck Martin wrote: > > >Anybody has better projections? What's the plan? > > My guess is that end user access will be more and more NAT444:ed (CGN) > while at the same time end users will get more and mo

Re: And so it ends (slightly off topic)

2011-02-03 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 11:04:29AM -0500, Ronald Bonica wrote: > Folks, > > Somehow, it is appropriate that this should happen on February 3. > On February 3, 1959, Buddy Holly, Richie Valens and JP Richardson > (aka The Big Bopper) died in a plane crash. Don McLean immortalized > that day as "