srcaddr=203.84.212.53
Dec 17 01:56:17: %CRYPTO-4-RECVD_PKT_INV_SPI: decaps:
rec'd IPSEC packet has invalid spi for
destaddr= prot=50 spi=0xEF7ED795(4018067349)
srcaddr=68.180.160.17
Dec 17 03:27:47: %CRYPTO-4-RECVD_PKT_INV_SPI: decaps:
rec'd IPSEC packet has invalid spi for
destaddr= prot=50 spi=0xEF7ED795(4018067349)
srcaddr=203.84.212.34
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
looking like some kind of adjustable depth sleeve, to get the cold air
to the equipment, and perhaps a brush strip opening to allow power
cables in?
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
ume of customer service
calls.
Appears to be failure in DNS resolution.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
e cert, and people's
Firefox browsers have mass-disabled addons.
Whoops.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
es, regardless of the configuration.
Last week somebody on the internet started a campaign to scan and
perhaps to exploit some zero day ipsec vulnerabilities.
This is the list of ip addresses we saw: https://pastebin.com/vrLRai9Q
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
BGPMon for data collection purposes.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
On 06/17/11 21:55, Elliot Finley wrote:
Anyone using a CPE that is reliable and costs<= $300 ?
features needed:
SFP for uplink, QnQ, basic layer 2 functionality.
If you're using something with the above parameters and you like it,
please share. :)
Thanks,
Elliot
Something like Zyxel MES-21
Cisco has finally release a new 10G switch, Catalyst 4500-X:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps12332/index.html
Does anyone know the price range, or the FCS date for this ?
We already have this type of attack in Bucharest/Romania since last
Friday. The targets where IP's of some local webhosters, but at one
moment we event saw IP's from Go Daddy.
Tcpdump will show something like:
11:10:41.447079 IP target > open_resolver_ip.53: 80+ [1au] ANY? isc.org.
(37)
11:10:4
ght
do the job.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
whois.radb.net 43
Trying 207.75.117.18...
^C
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
more than once)
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
Good morning,
We're in the market to move our IX peering off of our core (too much
BGP/CPU :-/ ) and onto a dedicated switch.
Brocade ICX 7750 Switch seems to satisfy all the requirements.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
James Jones wrote:
I am currently looking at using RouterOS as a way to build a Metro
Ethernet solution. Does anyone have experience with the device and the
OS? How is the performance? Are there any "Gotchas"?
-James
Be carefull not to crash the whole internet:
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2
I will sugest to test the throughput when a BGP peer is flapping.
-Original Message-
From: Michael J McCafferty
Sent: 23 iulie 2009 03:05
To: nanog
Subject: What else shall we test?
All,
We are putting together a test plan to test a pair of Cisco 7206 VXR's,
each with with NPE-G
worth the trouble IMHO.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
In Europe RIPE has a nice database. Hijacking is not possible since most
ISP's use filters based on RIPE Database.
Why ARIN don't use a similar tool ?
Philip Lavine wrote:
Please explain how this would be possible:
1 sender
1 mcast group
1 receiver
= no data loss
1 sender
1 mcast group
2+ receivers on same VLAN and physical segment
= data loss
Probably a crappy switch.
--
Best regards,
Adrian
Philip Lavine wrote:
More info if this helps:
Switch Platform:
4500 SUPII+
with gig line cards
Data rate is <100Mbps
Server OS: Windows 2003 R2 (please withhold snickering).
Multicast traffic is routed ?
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
19 matches
Mail list logo
