Re: Megaupload.com seized

2012-01-20 Thread Administrator
- Original Message - > From: "Paul Graydon" > To: nanog@nanog.org > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 2:37:16 PM > Subject: Re: Megaupload.com seized > From what I understand about MegaUpload's approach, they created a > hash of every file that they stored. > So Megaupload did de-dupe.

Spam from "baosteel"

2011-03-04 Thread imNet Administrator
]) > by li01.msk4.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4ED34157 > for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 01:20:13 -0600 > (CST) > Received: from User (unknown [95.59.199.4]) > by smtps-2.sercomtel.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1D32F00C2; > Fri, 4 Mar 2011 04:17:55 -0300 (

Re: Spam from "baosteel"

2011-03-04 Thread imNet Administrator
On 3/4/2011 10:35 AM, John Peach wrote: > Common phishing scam; we see them all the time, nearly always from > accounts which have been compromised by others who respond to the same > scam. I thought this might be the case. Any particular hints on spam filters that can catch this type of thing? I

Re: ipv6 question

2011-03-09 Thread imNet Administrator
On 3/9/2011 8:41 AM, ann kok wrote: > Hi > > I read ipv6forum.pdf about ipv6 > > It said > > MTU must be at least 1280 bytes (1500+) > Does it mean to set the mtu over 1500 No, it simply means that the minimum MTU for IPv6 is 1280. > > I set my linux box eth0 as 2001:db8:cafe:::12/64 but