Maybe more like medium, but if you know that you won't grow beyond a
certain size and growth trajectory, chassis would make life easier. If you
are dealing with some compute and you know how many racks you have, same
thing. In fact with small networks, you are actually starting out with more
than
True. Small networks would just have a single pizza box and call it a day.
I haven't looked that deeply yet. I was assuming you could just start with a
single pizza box and add more on as requirements matured. It certainly gets
more complicated quickly if you can't do that.
-
Mike Ha
I'm looking for a way to propagate the status of BFD sessions running on
one router to another via BGP.
Considering the versatility of BGP, I'm sure this is possible.
But when researching BFD and BGP, my biggest difficulty was avoiding
documents that talk about how to use BFD as a trigger for det
Douglas Fischer wrote on 22/12/2024 00:29:
Does any colleague have any clue about BFD session status propagation
over BGP?
this internet draft discusses the problem space
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd/
Unfortunately there are no known implementations of the protocol.
On 12/20/24 17:47, Tom Beecher wrote:
Are you talking about L1OE here, not MACSEC?
Correct.
GCM-AES-256 encryption at Layer 1, to be exact.
It was in reference to Jason's comments about encryption over "waves".
Mark.
Oh, so you're saying that small networks benefit more from a traditional
chassis than a distributed fabric? I would have thought it the other way around
in that you could start with a single pizza box, then add another appropriate
to the need, then another appropriate to the need as opposed to t
On 12/21/24 20:22, Tom Beecher wrote:
Gotcha. I think when I read Jason's comments, I xlated 'waves' as
'leased circuits' in my head, not native WDM. :)
I find that people say "waves" as shorthand for DWDM-based services a la
"wavelengths".
I'd say that the majority of new leased circu
When you say distributed router fabrics, are you thinking OCP concept with
interconnect switch with ATM-like cell relay (after flowery speeches about
"not betting against Ethernet", or course)?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_hyZwf6-Y0
https://www.ufispace.com/company/blog/what-is-a-distributed-
Gotcha. I think when I read Jason's comments, I xlated 'waves' as 'leased
circuits' in my head, not native WDM. :)
On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 12:33 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/20/24 17:47, Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> >
> > Are you talking about L1OE here, not MACSEC?
>
> Correct.
>
> GCM-AES-256
Yeah, UfiSpace is where I had first seen it, but then I saw it elsewhere.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Yan Filyurin"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: "NANOG"
Sent: Saturday, December 21,
It's just tradeoffs.
Many of the benefits ( smaller failure domains, power savings , incremental
expandability ) can be counterbalanced by increased operational complexity.
>From my experiences, if you don't have proper automation/tooling for
management/configuration and fault detection, it's a n
Uu that's sounds great!
Exactly what I was wondering.
Create a VRF called BFD-RouteServer on each PE, on that VRF on each PE
activate the IPs of Route-Server, and activate de BFD Sessions with the
participants connected to that PE.
And then, add a PBR deviation of BFD coming from participants
>
> I haven't looked that deeply yet. I was assuming you could just start with
> a single pizza box and add more on as requirements matured. It certainly
> gets more complicated quickly if you can't do that.
Fabric, fabric, fabric.
For a modular chassis, the fabric capacity has to be sized so it
Definitely will be interesting to read the list discussion about this. My
first reaction was why would you even need this, so def curious.
On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 8:25 PM Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Douglas Fischer wrote on 22/12/2024 00:29:
>
> Does any colleague have any clue about BFD session stat
14 matches
Mail list logo
