Re: etiquette for replying to daily digests

2024-11-08 Thread joel
> On Nov 8, 2024, at 15:58, William Herrin wrote: > >> On Nov 8, 2024, at 14:14, Alex Buie > > wrote: >> I (and I'm sure many of you) subscribe to daily digests from NANOG to keep >> things concentrated. However, there are sometimes messages in the digest I'd >> lik

Re: etiquette for replying to daily digests

2024-11-08 Thread William Herrin
> On Nov 8, 2024, at 14:14, Alex Buie wrote: > I (and I'm sure many of you) subscribe to daily digests from NANOG to keep > things concentrated. However, there are sometimes messages in the digest I'd > like to reply to, and I don't want to be that guy who just replies to the > digest and opens

Need AS3257/GTT Network Engineer Contact

2024-11-08 Thread Aaron Atac via NANOG
Hi, Seeking AS3257/GTT network engineering contact. We’ve been engaging your NOCC for the last 5 hours and haven’t made progress in issue resolution. Thanks, Aaron

etiquette for replying to daily digests

2024-11-08 Thread Alex Buie
Hi all, I (and I'm sure many of you) subscribe to daily digests from NANOG to keep things concentrated. However, there are sometimes messages in the digest I'd like to reply to, and I don't want to be that guy who just replies to the digest and opens an ugly new thread. Curious what workflow/proc

Re: etiquette for replying to daily digests

2024-11-08 Thread joel
Generally speaking, you want to trim the digest to the relevant posts, bottom posting your reponse (if you’re interested in nitpicking). This practice was prevalent until Microsoft Outlook introduced the top post culture. Let’s not go down that rabbit hole. Additionally, editing the subject lin

Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit?

2024-11-08 Thread Nick Hilliard
Mark Tinka wrote on 07/11/2024 20:33: I don't think there is any satisfactory argument that can be made for wanting to avoid route server routing. For the content/cloud folk, I think avoiding it provides a mechanism via which they can screen for the utility of having to keep an exchange point n

Re: etiquette for replying to daily digests

2024-11-08 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
It’s been decades since the last time I used this option.. and that was on an actual listserv run on lsoft.com, early 2000s. These days just subscribed from a gmail because threaded posts, keyboard shortcuts for email actions and what not. Makes it very easy to handle high traffic mailing list

Re: etiquette for replying to daily digests

2024-11-08 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Does nanog have a mime digest format so you get one big email with all the emails of the day attached as separate eml? Then all you do is select just the particular email you want to reply to and there you are. --srs From: NANOG on behalf of j...@joelesler.net

Re: etiquette for replying to daily digests

2024-11-08 Thread Alex Buie
Appreciate all the input everyone! It's helpful Suresh - great pointer - it looks like they do. I didn't even notice it as an option. I think this will be the fastest/easiest method for me in webmail-land. Thanks for pointing that out! *Alex Buie*Senior Cloud Operations Engineer 450 Century P

Spoofer Report for NANOG for Oct 2024

2024-11-08 Thread CAIDA Spoofer Project
In response to feedback from operational security communities, CAIDA's source address validation measurement project (https://spoofer.caida.org) is automatically generating monthly reports of ASes originating prefixes in BGP for systems from which we received packets with a spoofed source address.

Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit?

2024-11-08 Thread Mark Tinka
On 11/7/24 23:43, Tom Beecher wrote: Plenty of eyeball networks will announce prefixes differently via a bilateral session vs a route server session vs DFZ, then come yelling because traffic isn't going the way they expected it to. There can be times that the administrative overhead of d