Re: duke.edu DNS IPv6 does not work

2024-09-19 Thread Mark Andrews
Looks like they have removed the IPv6 addresses. % dig nameserver1.mc.duke.edu ;; BADCOOKIE, retrying. ; <<>> DiG 9.21.0-dev <<>> nameserver1.mc.duke.edu ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 51760 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER

duke.edu DNS IPv6 does not work

2024-09-19 Thread Seth Mattinen via NANOG
Is there anyone from duke.edu on this list? I am having problems with IPv6 on one of their sub-delegations causing mail delays. Trying to go through the front door writes me off with "not our problem". dm.duke.edu. 21600 IN NS nameserver1.mc.duke.edu. dm.duke.edu. 21600 IN NS nameserver2.mc.du

Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcements

2024-09-19 Thread Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) via NANOG
For some IETF work in progress related to Source Address Validation (SAV), it is useful to know the purposes for which NO_EXPORT may be attached to routes announced in BGP, especially towards transit providers? I know it makes sense for an AS to announce an aggregate less-specific prefix to tra

Re: Looking for X's contact

2024-09-19 Thread Rubens Kuhl
Jorge, Just curious if this issue was resolved or is it still an issue for non-Brazilian networks ? Rubens On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 4:09 PM Jorge Lobo wrote: > > Hi folks > > I'm looking for X's (former twitter) technical contact, we haven't no luck > with mailing they noc. > > Their funny wa

Re: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcements

2024-09-19 Thread 7ri...@gmail.com
For some IETF work in progress related to Source Address Validation (SAV), it is useful to know the purposes for which NO_EXPORT may be attached to routes announced in BGP, especially towards transit providers? I know it makes sense for an AS to announce an aggregate less-specific prefix t