On 27/02/2024 18:47, William Herrin wrote:
Then I'd write a script to monitor the local tftp server and stop frr
if it detects any problems with the tftp server.
There are other ways to achieve this without actually stopping the
routing daemon.
We have DNS servers where the anycast service
> On Apr 6, 2024, at 10:30, Ray Bellis wrote:
> On 27/02/2024 18:47, William Herrin wrote:
>> Then I'd write a script to monitor the local tftp server and stop frr if it
>> detects any problems with the tftp server.
> There are other ways to achieve this without actually stopping the routing
It appears that 2600:: no longer responds to ICMP.
$ mtr -rwc 1 2600::
Start: 2024-04-06T10:53:41+0100
HOST: metropolis Loss%
1.|-- lcy02.flat.b621.net 0.0%
[...]
6.|-- ldn-b4-link.ip.twelve99.net 0.0%
7.|-- ldn-bb1-v
I don't know what happed to 2600::, but 2a09:: and 2a11:: can be used as
alternatives. These are addresses of https://dns.sb/ running by xTom.
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG On Behalf Of Ben
> Cartwright-Cox via NANOG
> Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2024 6:01 PM
> To: North American Networ
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 06:19:57PM +0800,
Soha Jin wrote
a message of 50 lines which said:
> I don't know what happed to 2600::, but 2a09:: and 2a11:: can be
> used as alternatives. These are addresses of https://dns.sb/ running
> by xTom.
Very good DNS service, buy the way. But, although I u
I have been trying to get _away_ from caching appliances on our network — other
than Google, we are able to pick up most of the stuff that otherwise would be
cacheable via private peering; so it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense for us
to have appliances in the datacenter taking up space, power,
2409:: is replying the ICMPv6 request, in case anyone interested
> On 6 Apr 2024, at 15:31, nanog@nanog.org wrote:
>
> It appears that 2600:: no longer responds to ICMP.
>
> $ mtr -rwc 1 2600::
> Start: 2024-04-06T10:53:41+0100
> HOST: metropolis Loss%
> 1.|-
On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 at 12:00, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> That’s been the normal way of doing it for some 35 years now. iBGP
> advertise, or don’t advertise, the service address, which is attached to the
> loopback, depending whether you’re ready to service traffic.
If we are talking about eBGP, th
Agreed ... it generally doesn't make sense to install caches where the
content is just a few racks over.
But if you have a network that serves smaller population centers where
CDNs are sparse or non-existent, then it gets the content closer to the
eyeballs and saves considerably on transport b
9 matches
Mail list logo
