There is IPV4 exhaustion and many ISPs lease IPV4 space from other
entities, such as brokers and other providers. One of the biggest IPv4
lessors is Cogent. By Cogent having legacy IP space from IANA which it
inherited when it acquired PSInet, Cogent was not required to sign a
contract when RIR ARI
I personally find college, for the most part, as a scam and simply a quick
way to enter into debt. Yes there are exceptions, like everything.
I/We started doing fixed wireless in 2006 with no training. We started
fiber to the home in 2019 with little training - a neighbor to the north
showed us
Thus spake Tom Samplonius (t...@samplonius.org) on Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at
04:54:17PM -0800:
>
> In the world of IRR and RPKI, BGP route acceptance criteria is important to
> get right.
>
> DE-CIX has published a detailed flow chart documenting their acceptance
> criteria: https://www.de-cix
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 9:31 PM Tom Samplonius wrote:
>> The most surprising thing in the DE-DIX flow chart, was that they check
>> that the origin AS exists in the IRR as-set, before doing RPKI, and if the
>> set existence fails, they reject the route. I don’t see a problem with
>> this,
I am out of ideas on how to get this fixed. Long story short I am a customer
of Comcast and am advertising my own /24 block I own through them. Comcast of
course BGP peers with multiple ISPs. Other ISPs are accepting my prefix just
fine, except Tata. This is causing random destinations to dr
>
> Therefore, Cogent currently does not have and is not member of ARIN. It
> refuses to sign contract with ARIN and currently Cogent is not bound by
> this RUD rules and regulations.
>
> There is one downfall to not being ARIN member, Cogent cannot currently
> issue ROAs or RPKIs. They only update
I many years ago worked at Tata, responsible for their BGP, they are giving
you the right answer, Comcast has to be the one contacting them, as then
both sides can see what is being sent and received and can resolve this
issue.
-jim
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:04 AM Jamie Chetta via NANOG
wrote:
This passing the buck thing was old a very long time ago.
CDNs and security services are great at it too.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Jamie Chetta via NANOG"
To: n
Everyone thinks they're a unicorn and they're special and it's a secret...
other than those that don't. ;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Samplonius"
To: nanog@na
>
> Comcast has to be the one contacting them
>
This is the correct answer. It's pretty straight forward ; Comcast needs to
get with Tata, say "hey, I'm announcing prefix FOO to you, your LGs don't
look like you're accepting it. Can we figure out why?"
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:43 AM jim deleski
Im not sure, just thinking, maybe is a thing with the /24. Is it possible to
you get from Comcast maybe a /22 ??
Regards
Diego
From: NANOG on behalf of Mike
Hammett
Date: Friday, November 17, 2023 at 09:51
To: Jamie Chetta
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Out of ideas - Comcast issue BGP pe
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global
IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
UKNOF, TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bg
Is your IRR and RPKI roas all squared away?
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023, 8:12 AM Diego Eduardo Zorrilla Fierro (diefierr) via
NANOG wrote:
> Im not sure, just thinking, maybe is a thing with the /24. Is it possible
> to you get from Comcast maybe a /22 ??
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Diego
>
>
>
> *From: *NANOG
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 15:17, Jamie Chetta via NANOG wrote:
>
> I am out of ideas on how to get this fixed. Long story short I am a customer
> of Comcast and am advertising my own /24 block I own through them. Comcast
> of course BGP peers with multiple ISPs. Other ISPs are accepting my prefi
Tom, thanks. I'm an academic researcher, no a network operator, sorry for
the confusion, I should have been clearer.
The practice you described indeed shouldn't requite ROA. I didn't even
consider it, probably since I've been working so much on prefix hijacks,
and this prefix would result in incre
15 matches
Mail list logo
