Hello folks,
Based on data I've gathered through quantitative and qualitative surveying,
I can detect no application of Provider Backbone Bridging (MAC-in-MAC).
Please bear with me while I clarify that I am not enquiring about Provider
Bridging (QinQ).
I would like to ask specifically about knowl
Hello,
We have a circuit in MI1 that we are trying to relocate, but there's a crazy
delay. Does anyone have the ability and desire to coordinate a Equinix cross
connect and sell us DIA for 3-4months? Usage is 2-3Gbps Residential, we can use
our own IPs/ASN if necessary.
Eric
We can help you. I will contact offlist
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:42 Eric C. Miller wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We have a circuit in MI1 that we are trying to relocate, but there’s a
> crazy delay. Does anyone have the ability and desire to coordinate a
> Equinix cross connect and sell us DIA for
I don't think any of us really understand what you're hoping to find. I
sure don't.I think that this might be a result of a disconnect between
your understanding of how these should be monitored and how they are
monitored.
Specifically, of your two statements below, one is true and one is fa
>
> What would have been nice is if Juniper oversubscribed the face plate of
> this platform, as most people are more likely to run out of ports than
> they would the 400Gbps forwarding capacity of Trio.
>
You're restricted to 400G because they did fixed lane allocations to the EA
chip on the PFE
Does Fusion not make sense in this case? I've not had a ton of experience
with it, but it does well to add a crazy port count to an otherwise very
port limited device.
-Matt
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 9:01 AM Tom Beecher wrote:
> What would have been nice is if Juniper oversubscribed the face plat
On 8/23/23 17:01, Tom Beecher wrote:
I'm not sure they allow oversubscription on anything in the MX line
anymore honestly. I could be wrong, I've been face down in a specific
subset of equipment for a while, someone please correct me if I am.
On the new ACX line, yes.
If I look at the MPC
On Wednesday, 23 August, 2023 16:33, "Mark Tinka" said:
[faceplate oversubscription]
> On the new ACX line, yes.
Not Trio, and different PLM :)
> We don't mess around with any other MX products, so not sure (although
> we are still yet to deploy the MPC10E's and the MX304).
MX304 (well, stric
some of these port capabilities are weird to me. like on the
ACX7100-48L you can do 4x100 or 8x50, but ONLY one 40g ?!
me@7100> show chassis pic pic-slot 0 fpc-slot 0 | find 400
48 0 1x400G 1x100G 1x40G 4x100G 2x100G 8x50G 2x50G 4x25G
4x10G 3x100G
49 0 1x400G 1x100G 1x4
On 8/23/23 18:29, t...@pelican.org wrote:
Not Trio, and different PLM :)
Yes, aware... I was just speaking in general for what is likely to be a
very popular platform :-).
MX304 (well, strictly LMIC16) has the same restriction, and a need for another entry in the
magic port checker (h
Pascal
Could you elaborate a bit more? Maybe some desired features or industry.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:04 AM Pascal Masha wrote:
> Hello Folks,
>
> Any good alternatives to Ciena Blue Planet out there?
>
> Regards,
> Paschal Masha
>
--
- Andrew "lathama" Latham -
11 matches
Mail list logo
