>
> I think we all appreciate how open source projects work. Calling out
> their limitations is as old as mailing lists. I don't code. I test a
> lot, and continue to test IS-IS in FRR on FreeBSD every year or so. I'll
> keep testing and giving feedback at least once or twice a year. If it's
> stil
On 5/9/23 14:32, Tom Beecher wrote:
Except you didn't exactly "call out limitations". You simply said :
IS-IS in Quagga and FRR are not yet ready for business, is what I
would
caution.
The reality is that's not true.
And just a few weeks prior, I had given an update about thi
Does anyone know of a contact of someone (presumably at Webex/Cisco) who
can take a look at the DNS for webex.com?
It has been for some time now, logging a lot of DNSSEC warnings on my
resolver:
dnssec: validating
external-media75.public.wnrtm-a-2.prod.infra.webex.com/NSEC: no valid
signatu
When I worked for a local/regional ISP in the late 90s/early 00s, we
initially SWIP'd assignments for business customers and did generic
assignments for things like dial-up address pools or NAT front-end ranges
for residential customers, but provided more detailed information for
business customers
From: Mark Tinka
Date: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 2:03 AM
To: Phil Bedard , nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Routed optical networks
On 5/8/23 21:53, Phil Bedard wrote:
There are quite a few QDD pluggables in production today capable of
supporting 100G signals over 1000s of km or 400G near 1500
Up until this moment I was feeling that my take on the decline of traffic
growth was somewhat isolated, in that I have long felt that we are nearing
the top of the S curve of the data we humans can create and consume. About
the only source of future traffic growth I can think of comes from getting
>
> The implication being that while it might work, it would make
> administration of the system onerous and unpredictable, considering we are
> dealing with a ton of FreeBSD installations, and not just a single server.
>
Adjusting a single tunable is 'onerous'? Ok.
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 9:00 AM
There is nothing to worry about here. There is an insecure delegation at
webex.com (no DS RRset).
Named does bottom up validation (follows the RRSIG signer names) then does to
down to prove insecure
if that fails. The messages are logged during the first stage.
> On 9 May 2023, at 23:33, Reube
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 6:40 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
>> The implication being that while it might work, it would make administration
>> of the system onerous and unpredictable, considering we are dealing with a
>> ton of FreeBSD installations, and not just a single server.
>
> Adjusting a single tu
- Original Message -
> From: "William Herrin"
> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 6:40 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
>>> The implication being that while it might work, it would make
>>> administration of
>>> the system onerous and unpredictable, considering we are dealing with a ton
>>> of
>>> FreeBSD i
On 5/10/23 03:40, Tom Beecher wrote:
Adjusting a single tunable is 'onerous'? Ok.
In the context of long term administration of the environment, years
after everybody has forgotten about the hack, or worse, folk leave and
others take over; or if future FreeBSD updates decide to "go their
On 5/9/23 20:37, Phil Bedard wrote:
[phil] These are already available today and have been for some time
and in use in production networks for over a year now. This is with
400G links running up to 600km in routers with QDD ports. 400G-16QAM
using 60Gbaud (the OpenZR+ standard) can reach a
12 matches
Mail list logo
