RE: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

Big OTTs installed caches all over the world. Big OTTs support IPv6. Hosts prefer IPv6. Hence, traffic becomes IPv6 to big OTTs. It is not visible for IXes. IXes statistics on IPv6 are not representative. Ed/ -Original Message- From: Abraham Y. Chen [mailto:ayc...@avinta.com] Sent: Sunday,

Re: Newbie Concern: (BGP) AS-Path Oscillation

On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 9:52 PM Pirawat WATANAPONGSE via NANOG wrote: > On one of our prefixes, we are detecting continuous “BGP AS-Path Changes” in > the order of 1,000 announcements per hour---practically one every 3-4 seconds. > Those paths oscillate between two of our immediate upstreams. Hi

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG wrote: Big OTTs installed caches all over the world. Big OTTs support IPv6. As large network operational cost to support IPv6 is negligible for OTTs spending a lot more money at the application layer, they may. Hosts prefer IPv6. No. As many retail ISPs can not

MAP-T Implementation

Has anyone successfully deployed MAP-T? We are in the process of testing and have it working in our lab. We are running into an issue where the last half of the ipv4 prefix doesn't work. I.E. x.x.x.0/24 assigned x.x.x.0-127 works, x.x.x.128-255 does not. We are able to manipulate our DHCP conf

Re: Newbie Concern: (BGP) AS-Path Oscillation

[ i would have written privately except the damned dmark crap obscured your email address. gr. ] > On one of our prefixes, we are detecting continuous “BGP AS-Path > Changes” in the order of 1,000 announcements per hour---practically > one every 3-4 seconds. where is this being 'detected?'