This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global
IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/4409/text?r=9&s=1
the body of the proposed law:
"(a) Conduct prohibited.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for an operator of an email service
to use a filtering algorithm to apply a label to an email sent to an
email account from
> On Jul 29, 2022, at 3:05 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>
>
>
> https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/4409/text?r=9&s=1
>
> the body of the proposed law:
>
> "(a) Conduct prohibited.—
>
> (1) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for an operator of an email service to
> use a
So instead of applying a label, just drop the email outright.
-Dan
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022, Michael Thomas wrote:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/4409/text?r=9&s=1
the body of the proposed law:
"(a) Conduct prohibited.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for an oper
It appears that Michael Thomas said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>
>https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/4409/text?r=9&s=1
>
>the body of the proposed law:
This bill was filed by a bunch of the usual right wing suspects about
a month ago. It was referred to committee, like all filed bills
> On Jul 29, 2022, at 3:37 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
> It appears that Michael Thomas said:
>> -=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>>
>> https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/4409/text?r=9&s=1
>>
>> the body of the proposed law:
>
> This bill was filed by a bunch of the usual right wing susp
Leave the private matter of private email handling in the hands of the private
participants of the private email system.
If congress wants to create a government mandate on political campaign emails,
the political campaigns themselves ought to be forced to mark their emails as a
political campa
If heavily left leaning tech companies didn’t monkey with political content
then they wouldn’t feel a need for such legislation.
-richey
From: NANOG on behalf of
Anne Mitchell
Date: Friday, July 29, 2022 at 5:58 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Sigh, friends don't let politicians write te
On 7/29/22 2:57 PM, Anne Mitchell wrote:
On Jul 29, 2022, at 3:37 PM, John Levine wrote:
It appears that Michael Thomas said:
-=-=-=-=-=-
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/4409/text?r=9&s=1
the body of the proposed law:
This bill was filed by a bunch of the usua
Likelihood of passage aside I wonder where they believe they get
jurisdiction for this? Put another way would it stand up in court?
Put yet another way if they have jurisdiction for this wouldn't they
basically have jurisdiction for just about anything like no more
letter 'W's on the internet? G
10 matches
Mail list logo
