Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-08 Thread Robert DeVita
Does anyone have information on a widespread Rogers outage in Canada. I have customers with multiple sites down. Thanks Rob [cid:image001.jpg@01D892AF.488E0A30] Robert DeVita​​ CEO and Founder t: (469) 581-2160 | m: (469) 441-8864 e: radev...@mejeticks.com | w:

EVPN-VXLAN Service Types

2022-07-08 Thread Graham Johnston via NANOG
Good day, NANOG. I'm at the front end of an expected implementation of EVPN-VXLAN as the primary method to shift a network that is largely based on traditional Ethernet switching and spanning-tree to one that attempts to route traffic as often as possible, and where we want to separate the phys

ICANN

2022-07-08 Thread Keith Medcalf
Does anyone have contact information (or address for service of legal documents) for ICANN? There web site does not appear to contain contact information. ICANN apparently promulgates a policy which requires clickage on spam links in e-mail. I intend to sue them for trillions of dollars for th

Re: ICANN

2022-07-08 Thread Rubens Kuhl
If you believe in everything an email says, I have an island to sell that you might be interested in. That said, ICANN has a compliance department: https://www.icann.org/compliance/complaint Rubens On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 12:22 PM Keith Medcalf wrote: > > > Does anyone have contact information

ICANN

2022-07-08 Thread Sylvain Baya
Dear NANOG-ers, Hopefully, this email finds you in good health! Please see my comments below, inline... Le vendredi 8 juillet 2022, Rubens Kuhl a écrit : > If you believe in everything an email says, I have an island to sell > that you might be interested in. > > That said, ICANN has a complia

Re: ICANN

2022-07-08 Thread David Conrad
On Jul 8, 2022, at 8:21 AM, Keith Medcalf wrote: > Does anyone have contact information (or address for service of legal > documents) for ICANN? https://www.icann.org/locations? > There web site does not appear to contain contact > information. Sure it does.

Mystery MAC address

2022-07-08 Thread JoeSox
Hello, I have something I have never seen before and was wondering if anyone in the community has seen something like this? So some active directory accounts are getting locked intermittently and I had to do some sniffing and I have an IP address showing up in a non-used subnet 10.1.2.x And it sh

Re: Mystery MAC address

2022-07-08 Thread Christopher Morrow
mac addresses can be lies... and they can repeat... joy! On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 12:22 PM JoeSox wrote: > Hello, > > I have something I have never seen before and was wondering if anyone in > the community has seen something like this? > > So some active directory accounts are getting locked int

Re: Mystery MAC address

2022-07-08 Thread heasley
Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 12:43:49PM -0400, Christopher Morrow: > mac addresses can be lies... and they can repeat... joy! > eg; https://www.extremenetworks.com/extreme-networks-blog/wi-fi-mac-randomization-privacy-and-collateral-damage/ > On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 12:22 PM JoeSox wrote: > > > Hello,

Spoofer Report for NANOG for Jun 2022

2022-07-08 Thread CAIDA Spoofer Project
In response to feedback from operational security communities, CAIDA's source address validation measurement project (https://spoofer.caida.org) is automatically generating monthly reports of ASes originating prefixes in BGP for systems from which we received packets with a spoofed source address.

Re: Mystery MAC address

2022-07-08 Thread Brandon Svec via NANOG
I think that is a randomized address. Look at the second character in a MAC address, if it is a 2, 6, A, or E it is a randomized address. Per https://www.mist.com/get-to-know-mac-address-randomization-in-2020/ *Brandon Svec* On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 9:24 AM JoeSox wrote: > Hello, > > I have som

Re: Mystery MAC address

2022-07-08 Thread Saku Ytti
Technically the right most is multicast bit, the 2nd right most is locally assigned, it doesn't imply randomisation, it is unknowable how it was assigned. On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 20:07, Brandon Svec via NANOG wrote: > I think that is a randomized address. Look at the second character in a > MAC ad

Re: ICANN

2022-07-08 Thread John Levine
It appears that Keith Medcalf said: > >Does anyone have contact information (or address for service of legal >documents) for ICANN? There web site does not appear to contain contact >information. If you really wish to send such a letter, I would send it by paper mail, attn General Counsel. Thei

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-08 Thread Jay Hennigan
On 7/8/22 07:44, Robert DeVita wrote: Does anyone have information on a widespread Rogers outage in Canada. I have customers with multiple sites down. There's discussion on the Outages mailing list. Seems widespread, affecting all services, mobile, voice, Internet. No cause or ETR posted yet.

Re: ICANN

2022-07-08 Thread Jay Hennigan
On 7/8/22 08:24, Rubens Kuhl wrote: If you believe in everything an email says, I have an island to sell that you might be interested in. I have a bridge for sale. This will be beneficial in reaching your newly-purchased island. -- Jay Hennigan - j...@west.net Network Engineering - CCIE #788

Re: Mystery MAC address

2022-07-08 Thread Crist Clark
The vendor code C0-EA-E4 looks like Sonicwall. It’s not going unusual for a device take a global address on the device and flip the local bit for some other use. On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 10:13 AM Saku Ytti wrote: > Technically the right most is multicast bit, the 2nd right most is locally > assig

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-08 Thread Andrew Paolucci via NANOG
In the early hours of the morning around 2-3am my modem got hit with a configuration update that caused a DHCP release that wasn't renewed for about two hours, after rollback the connection was fine for 3 hours before this network wide outage. Maybe a failed night time update was attempted agai

Re: Mystery MAC address

2022-07-08 Thread William Herrin
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 9:22 AM JoeSox wrote: > And it shows an unrecognized MAC address. This virtual machine is in a > Nutanix environment. > I am trying to figure this out without bringing in paid outside help. Thanks > in advance for any responses. > c2:ea:e4:c5:57:e6 > is the MAC in question

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-08 Thread Snowmobile2004
According to Cloudflare Radar , Rogers BGP announcements spiked massively to levels 536,777% higher than normal (343,601 vs 64 normally) just minutes before the outage. I would not be surprised if this happened to be the culprit. Rega

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-08 Thread Eric Kuhnke
Whatever they did, it has also taken out SS7/PSTN 911 services for many millions of people. https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/rogers-outage-cell-mobile-wifi-1.6514373 On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 11:44, Snowmobile2004 wrote: > According to Cloudflare Radar >

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-08 Thread jim deleskie
i cant see BGP taking out SS7. -jim On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:45 PM Snowmobile2004 wrote: > According to Cloudflare Radar > , Rogers > BGP announcements spiked massively to levels 536,777% higher than normal > (343,601 vs 64 normall

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-08 Thread Eric Kuhnke
I can't either, but the reality right now seems to be that 911 calls are failing for anyone on a Rogers cellphone. I have seen anecdotal reports that the mobile network is in a half broken state that phones remain registered to, so a 911 call will attempt and then fail. This is unlike what would

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-08 Thread Pete Baldwin - TCC
Seems like their external BGP peers are dead. If their internal network is the same, and they carry M2PA etc, or use BGP/MPLS to carry SS7 traffic, or their softswitches/STPs rely on BGP/MPLS in some way then SS7 might exist, but not be functional. -- Pete Baldwin On 2022-07-08 15:30, jim d

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-08 Thread Clayton Zekelman
Why not? If the SS7 is encapsulated in IP... (think SIGTRAN). At 03:30 PM 08/07/2022, jim deleskie wrote: i cant see BGP taking out SS7. -jim -- Clayton Zekelman Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi) 3363 Tecumseh Rd. E Windsor, Ontario N8W 1H4 tel. 519-985-8410 fax. 519-985-8409

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-08 Thread Andrew Paolucci via NANOG
I believe the call centers run by law enforcement and municipalities in the GTA are mostly homed on single providers, I know some Bell and Telus users in certain areas are still able to reach emergency services. Regards, Andrew Paolucci Original Message On Jul. 8, 2022, 3:39

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-08 Thread Clayton Zekelman
The E911 network in Ontario and Quebec is run by Bell Canada. The PSAPs may have non-emergency lines that are provided by other carriers. At 03:56 PM 08/07/2022, Andrew Paolucci via NANOG wrote: I believe the call centers run by law enforcement and municipalities in the GTA are mostly homed o

Re: Spoofer Report for NANOG for Jun 2022

2022-07-08 Thread scott via NANOG
"> 19230 NANOG 2016-06-13 2022-06-07" Wait...what? :) scott On 7/8/2022 7:00 AM, CAIDA Spoofer Project wrote: In response to feedback from operational security communities, CAIDA's source address validation measurement project (https://spoofer.caida.org) is

Re: ICANN

2022-07-08 Thread bzs
You'd probably be 99.999% more successful in improving the state of humanity by being more specific about what you are referring to. Put another way you've probably reached "ICANN" by posting here, or as well as you're likely to by any other means you're imagining. On July 8, 2022 at 09:21 kmed

Re: Mystery MAC address

2022-07-08 Thread JoeSox
FOLLOWUP: Looks like that MAC is our Sonicwall firewall and the packets are coming in from upstream on a shared VLAN but not a shared subnet (not sure how this is happening). Our sonicwall shows one virus hit on one of the new 10.1.2.0 addresses (upstream subnet) seen today. Thanks for all the res

Any admins for Yahoo mail here?

2022-07-08 Thread Milt Aitken
Big customer cannot exchange email with yahoo either way. Error message is ambiguous. No joy through the usual channels. If there's a yahoo admin here, please contact me off list. Thanks Milt Aitken Net2Atlanta

is nanog really in the spoofer report?

2022-07-08 Thread scott via NANOG
I just realized that many automatically put emails with the subject line of "Spoofer Report for NANOG" in the trash, so I changed it. Is that for real or a spoof itself? If it's real I know a buncha guys that will help. ;) scott On 7/8/2022 10:35 AM, scott wrote: "> 19230  NANOG