Looks like Honeywell will be affected.
On Sat, Apr 2, 2022, 5:11 PM John Curran wrote:
> NANOGers -
>
> As previously reported here, ARIN will be shutting down the ARIN-NONAUTH
> IRR database on *Monday, 4 April 2022 at 12:00 PM ET.*
>
> It is quite likely that some network operators will see di
I didn't know anyone still cared?
Google has been trying to move away from Internet email for many years
now. Just let them. There is no way you can "fix" that problem on your
side.
If you care about specific recipients, then inform them that Google
randomly throws away some of their legitimate
Periodically I still do some work on routing protocols. 12? years ago I had kind
of given up on ospf and isis, and picked the babel protocol as an IGP
for meshy networks because I felt link-state had gone as far as it
could and somehow unifying BGP DV with an IGP that was also DV
(distance vector)
Dave Taht wrote:
Periodically I still do some work on routing protocols. 12? years ago I had kind
of given up on ospf and isis, and picked the babel protocol as an IGP
for meshy networks because I felt link-state had gone as far as it
could and somehow unifying BGP DV with an IGP that was also D
It appears that Bjørn Mork said:
>Google has been trying to move away from Internet email for many years
>now. Just let them. There is no way you can "fix" that problem on your
>side.
Don't be silly. Gmail has over a billion users and hosts mail for
vast numbers of businesses large and small.
i try to keep a list of goog's ipv6 email space and don't deliver to it;
rather using ipv4 instead. unfortunately, goog does not cooperate with
dnswl.org, so this can not be automated.
this is mildly damaging to the ipv6 religion, but i don't let that spoil
my coffee.
their lack of cooperation w
Randy Bush writes:
> i try to keep a list of goog's ipv6 email space and don't deliver to it;
> rather using ipv4 instead. unfortunately, goog does not cooperate with
> dnswl.org, so this can not be automated.
How about using their SPF records as automation input? Their MXes are
inside those b
On Apr 3, 2022, at 9:41 AM, John Levine wrote:
>
> It appears that Bjørn Mork said:
>> Google has been trying to move away from Internet email for many years
>> now. Just let them. There is no way you can "fix" that problem on your
>> side.
>
> Don't be silly. Gmail has over a billion users
On 4/3/22 13:55, Dave Taht wrote:
Periodically I still do some work on routing protocols. 12? years ago I had kind
of given up on ospf and isis, and picked the babel protocol as an IGP
for meshy networks because I felt link-state had gone as far as it
could and somehow unifying BGP DV with an
On a slightly related subject... This DKIM failure surprised me, but at
least I verified that many NANOG subscribers have mailservers returning
DMARC failure reports ;-)
Bjørn Mork writes:
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
> dkim=fail header.i=@mork.no header.s=b header.b=NB0BT8Ez;
> sp
On 4/3/22 12:12 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
On a slightly related subject... This DKIM failure surprised me, but at
least I verified that many NANOG subscribers have mailservers returning
DMARC failure reports ;-)
Oh wow, you should report that to Murray.
Mike
Bjørn Mork writes:
Authenticati
It appears that Michael Thomas said:
>
>On 4/3/22 12:12 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> On a slightly related subject... This DKIM failure surprised me, but at
>> least I verified that many NANOG subscribers have mailservers returning
>> DMARC failure reports ;-)
>
>Oh wow, you should report that to Murr
> On Apr 3, 2022, at 1:40 PM, na...@shankland.org wrote:
>
>> It appears that Bjørn Mork said:
>>> Google has been trying to move away from Internet email for many years
>>> now. Just let them. There is no way you can "fix" that problem on your
>>> side.
>>
>> Don't be silly. Gmail has over
On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 12:04 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/3/22 13:55, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> > Periodically I still do some work on routing protocols. 12? years ago I had
> > kind
> > of given up on ospf and isis, and picked the babel protocol as an IGP
> > for meshy networks because I felt li
I'm actually not here to start a debate... happy to learn that the v4
over v6 feature I'm
playing with actually exists in another protocol, mainly. I'm
critically dependent on
source specific routing, also, so I am hoping there's an isis or ospf
that can do
what I need, or now that I have more rout
i am setting up new app/port monitoring. i like nfsen because i can
zooom in and see who is sending all that port 43 tls between 11:42 and
12:19. is there some other tool at which i should look?
randy
I use NTOP.
https://www.ntop.org/
Seems much more robust than nfsen. Also, NTOP gives you all sorts of network
statistics and lets you slice and dice flows both historically and in real
time, all from a single Web console.
-mel beckman
On Apr 3, 2022, at 7:12 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
i am se
Hello Dave:
There's RFC 8950 in the context of BGP. That's a refresher of RFC 5589 which is
the one we typically refer to internally.
I glanced at homenet too early, and then too late. Too early, it seemed that
the protocol would be OSPFv3; no discussion. So I left till too late, when the
choi
18 matches
Mail list logo
