Re: Contact request AS 6453

2022-01-15 Thread jim deleskie
Have you found anyone. Not there any more but can probably still find someone for you. -jim On Thu, Jan 13, 2022, 10:11 AM Drew Weaver wrote: > Does anyone have a contact for AS 6453 or are there any AS 6453 folks on > list? > > > > Seeing some routing trouble from their customers to the US. >

Re: Contact request AS 6453

2022-01-15 Thread Hank Nussbacher
On 15/01/2022 10:00, jim deleskie wrote: Did you try: https://www.peeringdb.com/net/437 peering-pol...@as6453.net peering-...@as6453.net ip...@tatacommunications.com Regards, Hank Have you found anyone.  Not there any more but can probably still find someone for you. -jim On Thu, Jan 13, 2

Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices

2022-01-15 Thread Colton Conor
True, but in general MPLS is more costly. It's available on limited devices, from limited vendors. Infact, many of these vendors, like Extreme, charge you if you want to enable MPLS features on a box. On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 3:11 AM Saku Ytti wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 00:31, Colton Conor

Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices -> MPLS instead?

2022-01-15 Thread Raymond Burkholder
On 1/15/22 10:22 AM, Colton Conor wrote: True, but in general MPLS is more costly. It's available on limited devices, from limited vendors. Infact, many of these vendors, like Extreme, charge you if you want to enable MPLS features on a box. And in this discussion group, when MPLS is mentioned, d

Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices

2022-01-15 Thread Mark Tinka
On 1/15/22 19:22, Colton Conor wrote: True, but in general MPLS is more costly. It's available on limited devices, from limited vendors. Infact, many of these vendors, like Extreme, charge you if you want to enable MPLS features on a box. Well, I don't entirely agree. Pretty much all chips

Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices -> MPLS instead?

2022-01-15 Thread Mark Tinka
On 1/15/22 21:16, Raymond Burkholder wrote: And in this discussion group, when MPLS is mentioned, does that include VPLS?  Or do operators simply use MPLS and manually bang up the various required point-to-point links?  Or is there a better way to do this? For example, Free Range Routin

Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices -> MPLS instead?

2022-01-15 Thread scott
On 1/15/2022 9:16 AM, Raymond Burkholder wrote: On 1/15/22 10:22 AM, Colton Conor wrote: True, but in general MPLS is more costly. It's available on limited devices, from limited vendors. Infact, many of these vendors, like Extreme, charge you if you want to enable MPLS features on a box. And

Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices

2022-01-15 Thread Jeff Tantsura
+1 Mark There’s no modern silicon that doesn’t support MPLS (and is capable of imposing at least 3 labels). There’s 0 additional price for vendors to enable MPLS on their devices. The rest is subject to vendors’ licensing and is completely artificial. SR-MPLS uses MPLS data-plane and requires

Open source mapping of US high voltage electrical grid

2022-01-15 Thread Eric Kuhnke
Possibly of interest for network operators who have inter-city circuits, where the underlying carrier is something on OPGW fiber in high voltage lines. These people seem to be making an effort at mapping out high voltage lines, hydroelectric dams, substations, etc. https://openinframap.org

Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices

2022-01-15 Thread Saku Ytti
On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 at 19:22, Colton Conor wrote: > True, but in general MPLS is more costly. It's available on limited > devices, from limited vendors. Infact, many of these vendors, like > Extreme, charge you if you want to enable MPLS features on a box Marketing, not fundamentals. DC people a