Jay Hennigan wrote:
Access/retail ISPs have no problem by peering with neutral
backbone providers.
Neutral backbone providers don't peer with access/retail ISPs. They
sell transit to them.
FYI, that is called paid peering.
CDN provided backbone only reduces costs of other backbone
provider
Matthew Petach wrote:
I'd like to take a moment to point out the other problem with this
sentence, which is "antitrust agencies".
One of the key aspects to both CDN providers and transit
providers is they tend to be multi-national organizations with
infrastructure in multiple countries on multi
* mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta) [Sun 17 Oct 2021, 11:17
CEST]:
Jay Hennigan wrote:
Neutral backbone providers don't peer with access/retail ISPs.
They sell transit to them.
FYI, that is called paid peering.
Can you please please please stop posting nonsense?
--
- On Oct 17, 2021, at 4:50 AM, Masataka Ohta
mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp wrote:
Hi,
> Matthew Petach wrote:
>> One of the key aspects to both CDN providers and transit
>> providers is they tend to be multi-national organizations with
>> infrastructure in multiple countries on multiple
søn. 17. okt. 2021 11.16 skrev Masataka Ohta <
mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>:
> Jay Hennigan wrote:
>
> >> Access/retail ISPs have no problem by peering with neutral
> >> backbone providers.
> >
> > Neutral backbone providers don't peer with access/retail ISPs. They
> > sell transit to them.
>
On 10/16/21 15:44, Masataka Ohta wrote:
What?
I will use my network for what I want my network to do for me. There are
no international rules about why a network must be built. Provided that
I am clear to those whom I want to connect to my network, I can do what
I want with it and not b
6 matches
Mail list logo
