Mark Tinka wrote:
Remember that CDN providers are not neutral at all.
Well, the purpose of a network is whatever its proprietor deems it to
be, and makes no false advertising about it.
What?
A private enterprise network that carries a company's internal traffic -
which may or may not inte
Jay Hennigan wrote:
Access/retail ISPs should want to peer with CDNs as it greatly reduces
their transport costs.
Not at all.
Access/retail ISPs have no problem by peering with neutral backbone
providers.
CDN provided backbone only reduces costs of other backbone providers
without reducing c
* mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta) [Sat 16 Oct 2021, 15:50
CEST]:
Access/retail ISPs have no problem by peering with neutral backbone
providers.
Getting strong Marie-Antoinette vibes here.
-- Niels.
On 10/16/21 06:48, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Jay Hennigan wrote:
Access/retail ISPs should want to peer with CDNs as it greatly
reduces their transport costs.
Not at all.
Access/retail ISPs have no problem by peering with neutral backbone
providers.
Neutral backbone providers don't peer with ac
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:26 AM Masataka Ohta <
mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
> Matthew Petach wrote:
>
> >>> With an anycast setup using the same IP addresses in every
> >>> location, returning SERVFAIL doesn't have the same effect,
> >>> however, because failing over from anycast addr
5 matches
Mail list logo