On 4/16/21 16:11, Graham Johnston wrote:
I do believe that I understand the intended purpose of BGP
graceful-restart. With that said, I was watching a video of a talk
given by someone respected in the industry the other day on the use of
graceful-shutdown and at the beginning of the talk there
Hello Graham,
I had a chance to analysis this topic GR and GR helper mode( default) for EoR
msg and for the LLGR timer afterwards and had e-mail correspondence with the
RFC auther.
I would say based on your environment topology and the type of BGP fault/error.
You keep the default mode unless
https://lucky225.medium.com/its-time-to-stop-using-sms-for-anything-203c41361c80
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2021/03/can-we-stop-pretending-sms-is-secure-now/
Anecdotal: With the prior consent of the DID holders, I have successfully
ported peoples' numbers using nothing more than a JPG scan of a
Every SMS 2FA should check the current carrier against the carrier when
enrolled and unenroll SMS for 2FA when a number is ported out. BofA and a
few others do this.
--
Tim
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021, 8:02 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>
> https://lucky225.medium.com/its-time-to-stop-using-sms-for-anything-2
No, every SMS 2FA should be prohibited by regulatory certifications. The telcos
had years to secure SMS. They did nothing. The plethora of well-secured
commercial 2FA authentication tokens, many of them free, should be a mandatory
replacement for 2FA in every security governance regime, such as
paypal used to openly support token 2fa, but have since made it nearly
impossible to use hardware tokens. they try very hard to ram sms down
everyones throats.
-Dan
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021, Mel Beckman wrote:
No, every SMS 2FA should be prohibited by regulatory certifications. The telcos
had ye
6 matches
Mail list logo
