Saudi Arabia

Hi, I've received a request to put a circuit into a Riyadh financial exchange. Any thoughts on how to get back haul from the AAE1 cable landing station would be appreciated. Off-list is best. 🙂 Roderick Beck Global Network Capacity Procurement United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.co

Re: Saudi Arabia

https://www.itc.sa/en/ They are great to work with. On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 03:24 Rod Beck wrote: > Hi, > > I've received a request to put a circuit into a Riyadh financial exchange. > Any thoughts on how to get back haul from the AAE1 cable landing station > would be appreciated. > > Off-list

Re: Saudi Arabia

Thanks, Mehmet. That is very helpful. -R. From: Mehmet Akcin Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 3:14 PM To: Rod Beck Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Saudi Arabia https://www.itc.sa/en/ They are great to work with. On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 03:24 Rod Beck mailto:

ASE - 100 Gig Wave

This cable is tapped out and I need a 100 gig wave from Hong Kong to Singapore. 3 year term. Roderick Beck Global Network Capacity Procurement United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com https://unitedcablecompany.com/video/ New York City & Budapest rod

APG: 100 Gig Wave: Singapore/TY3

Again, capacity is really due to video providers snapping everything up left and right. Need help. Off list, please. Roderick Beck Global Network Capacity Procurement United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com https://unitedcablecompany.com/video/ New

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

NANOG is not a service for receiving details on cable paths for commercial purposes. Please find somewhere else to collect this information. On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:54 AM Rod Beck wrote: > This cable is tapped out and I need a 100 gig wave from Hong Kong to > Singapore. 3 year term. > > Roder

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

Please review the Mailing List policies which specifically prohibit commercial discussions on the list. I would ask the list moderators to chime in here please Shane > On Mar 18, 2021, at 11:14 AM, Rod Beck > wrote: > >  > People post requests all the time. You are free to block me. And I kn

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

Actually, that language was intended to prohibit soliciting business and not asking for help. I have some hard words to describe like Shane Ronan, but I will forbear. I suggest you cease and desist before this gets ugly. Obviously you are underemployed. Get some work to do. Best, -R.

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

And by the way, it would not be making these requests if there was not a severe capacity shortage in the Pacific. I don't like telegraph what I am doing, Shane. From: NANOG on behalf of Rod Beck Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 4:27 PM To: sro...@ronan-online.com

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

Far from underemployed and I'm not worried about it getting ugly, in fact, my next email will be to Eric Gutshall to complain about being threatened publicly by one of his employees. I don't think this will end well for you. On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 11:27 AM Rod Beck wrote: > Actually, that lang

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

I see we've got the big swingers out today. Everyone's got something to prove. That was one thing I liked about the old ISP-Bandwidth list. That's pretty much what all of the conversation was, trying to find quotes on services. I didn't order anything from there, but it was nice being a fly on

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

I doubt that. You’ve been at it for months with requests all over the world. It was only a matter of time before someone said something. > On Mar 18, 2021, at 10:34, Rod Beck wrote: > >  > And by the way, it would not be making these requests if there was not a > severe capacity shortage in

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

A very different and more appropriate list for the OP’s posts than NANOG. I have nothing to prove other than improving the quality of posts to the mailing list. > On Mar 18, 2021, at 12:06 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > >  > I see we've got the big swingers out today. Everyone's got something to p

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 8:28 AM Rod Beck wrote: > Actually, that language was intended to prohibit soliciting business and > not asking for help. > Hi Rod, Yes and no. "Would you help me identify who does cable between A and B?" may be on topic. "I'm soliciting bids for X" is certainly not. The

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

On 3/18/21 18:11, William Herrin wrote: Yes and no. "Would you help me identify who does cable between A and B?" may be on topic. "I'm soliciting bids for X" is certainly not. The "three year term" statement pushed you solidly into the latter. Tend to agree with this. Asking what's avail

Re: Saudi Arabia

> https://www.itc.sa/en/ mehmet, you actually answered rod's question. that is not allowed on the nanog list. you need to start a 20 message thread excoriating him for asking for actual operational help finding a circuit in a difficult place. what is this world coming to? sheesh! randy --- r

Re: Saudi Arabia

Thank you for reminder. I didn’t realize i hit reply all. Sorry all. On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 09:52 Randy Bush wrote: > > https://www.itc.sa/en/ > > mehmet, you actually answered rod's question. that is not allowed on > the nanog list. you need to start a 20 message thread excoriating him > fo

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

On 3/18/21 18:09, JASON BOTHE via NANOG wrote: I doubt that. You’ve been at it for months with requests all over the world. It was only a matter of time before someone said something. I'm in two minds about this... I'm on & off NANOG, so have no recollection of the OP "doing this" more tha

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

A quick search shows the OP made 10 similar posts in just the month of March, which is what prompted by complaint. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 18, 2021, at 12:43 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: > >  > >> On 3/18/21 18:11, William Herrin wrote: >> >> >> Yes and no. "Would you help me identify who

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

CC back to the mailing list for visibility, since I ate the CC list. On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 1:31 PM Tom Beecher wrote: > Rod- > > Please refer to the usage guidelines found here. > https://nanog.org/resources/usage-guidelines/ > > 14. Posts that encourage or facilitate an agreement about the fo

Re: Saudi Arabia

ROFL -- J. Hellenthal The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume. > On Mar 18, 2021, at 11:54, Randy Bush wrote: > >  >> >> https://www.itc.sa/en/ > > mehmet, you actually answered rod's question. that is not allowe

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

You can reach out Telekom Malaysia, or Starhub they can help you with capacity on this route. On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 07:51 Rod Beck wrote: > This cable is tapped out and I need a 100 gig wave from Hong Kong to > Singapore. 3 year term. > > Roderick Beck > Global Network Capacity Procurement > >

Re: APG: 100 Gig Wave: Singapore/TY3

There is no capacity issue on this cable. The way this cable operates is that it’s segmented and not everyone has access to every segment. For Singapore to TY3 Starhub is your best choice (and possibly only) to work with. NTT has also capacity but they are extremely hard to get in touch and get pap

Re: APG: 100 Gig Wave: Singapore/TY3

I have a great relationship with NTT if anyone needs help. Ms. Lady Benjamin PD Cannon, ASCE 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC CEO l...@6by7.net "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in the world.” FCC License KJ6FJJ Sent from my iPhone via RFC1149. > On Mar 18

Re: APG: 100 Gig Wave: Singapore/TY3

Thanks, Mehmet, you are the champ! 😃 From: Mehmet Akcin Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 9:40 PM To: Rod Beck Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: APG: 100 Gig Wave: Singapore/TY3 There is no capacity issue on this cable. The way this cable operates is that it’s seg

Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:37 AM Tom Beecher wrote: > CC back to the mailing list for visibility, since I ate the CC list. > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 1:31 PM Tom Beecher wrote: > >> Rod- >> >> Please refer to the usage guidelines found here. >> https://nanog.org/resources/usage-guidelines/ >> >

Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

Perhaps the sales, marketing and 'business development' people who've never typed "enable" or "configure" into a router a single day in their lives might be better served with a dedicated list that is mission focused on bizdev, and not operational issues. On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 3:29 PM Matthew