Ipv6 help

2020-08-22 Thread Brian
Is there anyway to deploy ipv6 and push ipv4 traffic end to end across the ipv6 network. With out having an ipv4 address for everything that is ipv6? If someone could reach out off list if there is a real solution to deploy ipv6 as almost middleware.

Re: Ipv6 help

2020-08-22 Thread Ca By
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 6:51 AM Brian wrote: > Is there anyway to deploy ipv6 and push ipv4 traffic end to end across > the ipv6 network. With out having an ipv4 address for everything that is > ipv6? If someone could reach out off list if there is a real solution to > deploy ipv6 as almost midd

atmark trading

2020-08-22 Thread Bryan Holloway
Tired of receiving spam from these jamokes. https://www.atmarktrade.com/ Atmark Trading out of Chicago. Have tried unsubscribing numerous times; e-mailed their "info" accounts to no avail. My only recourse, now, is to shame. Doubt it will do any good, but if anyone has a contact who can act

Re: atmark trading

2020-08-22 Thread Mike Hale
I've found it useful to email management if certain sales people refuse to stop contacting you. On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 1:34 PM Bryan Holloway wrote: > Tired of receiving spam from these jamokes. > > https://www.atmarktrade.com/ > > Atmark Trading out of Chicago. > > Have tried unsubscribing numer

Re: atmark trading

2020-08-22 Thread Rubens Kuhl
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 5:45 PM Mike Hale wrote: > > I've found it useful to email management if certain sales people refuse to > stop contacting you. My experience is that management of spammer companies tries arguing it's not spam instead of changing practices. And this includes so-called rep

Re: atmark trading

2020-08-22 Thread Bryan Holloway
It's not sales; it's some dumb mailing list managed by "Soundest", which is now owned by "Omnisend", which sounds even less fun than its predecessor. Atmark's web-site has no contacts or management information listed other than "info@", otherwise I would do what you suggest. I don't have the

Re: atmark trading

2020-08-22 Thread Eric Tykwinski
> On Aug 22, 2020, at 4:53 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote: > > It's not sales; it's some dumb mailing list managed by "Soundest", which is > now owned by "Omnisend", which sounds even less fun than its predecessor. > > Atmark's web-site has no contacts or management information listed other than >

Re: atmark trading

2020-08-22 Thread Bryan Holloway
On 8/22/20 11:06 PM, Eric Tykwinski wrote: On Aug 22, 2020, at 4:53 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote: It's not sales; it's some dumb mailing list managed by "Soundest", which is now owned by "Omnisend", which sounds even less fun than its predecessor. Atmark's web-site has no contacts or managem

Re: atmark trading

2020-08-22 Thread Mel Beckman
Bryan, This is what inbound mail filters are for. Regex them to oblivion and get on with your life. No reason to waste another millisecond on them. -mel > On Aug 22, 2020, at 2:14 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote: > >  > > On 8/22/20 11:06 PM, Eric Tykwinski wrote: On Aug 22, 2020, at 4:53 P

Re: atmark trading

2020-08-22 Thread Bryan Holloway
Indeed, Mel, and I agree wholeheartedly. I suppose it's the optimist in me that people should behave according to their supposed attempts to allow things like, oh, I dunno ... "unsubscribe" links that actually do what they claim to do? Meh. I'm done ranting ... P.S.: Don't do business with A

RE: atmark trading

2020-08-22 Thread Jerry Cloe
Even better, bounce everything from them or even more severe null route their mail server. You're on nanog so I assume you have some control over your network. If they lose contact with other customers on your network, let them call you and beg forgiveness. This may sound cold, but its the only