That’s absurd…
Yes, you have to support both for now. However, you really only need IPv4
addresses on each front-end box and you only need that until the proportion of
eyeball users that lack IPv6 capabilities is small enough to be considered no
longer worth the cost of support.
I doubt seriou
While I agree about the likely outcome, I will point out that consumers have
been
begging for unbundling for years.
This fragmentation of streaming services _IS_ the direct result of that request.
It’s unbundled service, exactly what they have been asking for.
Owen
> On Nov 26, 2019, at 01:54
Well, not exactly. Each service is still a bunch of shows and movies
bundled together. If you only want to watch one show, you can't just buy
that, you have to buy the whole service.
Of course, there are services where you can buy individual movies and
episodes (Google Play comes to mind). But Net
On Thu, 2019-11-28 at 10:50 -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> While I agree about the likely outcome, I will point out that
> consumers have been
> begging for unbundling for years.
This is not the "unbundling" that consumers have been begging for.
Rather I would submit that it's actually quite the opp
I agree with Brian, this is not unbundling, it's just removing one layer of
distribution; you no longer need the Cable company to play aggregator to
the content distributors, you now buy from them direct (especially true in
the case of HBO and Disney, except ESPN is not yet included). The next
logi
Just a reminder. The ticket remains unclaimed. If it makes you feel better,
I'll raise the price from free to $10 :)
$1800 USD value and the conference is excellent.
Reply off-list if you're interested.
Oliver
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, 22:39 Oliver O'Boyle, wrote:
> Nanog:
>
> I have a free AWS r
Back in the old days, we had the ultimate in unbundling: you walked up,
got a ticket, and watched the movie.
In principle it wouldn't be that hard these days to do something similar
with a tremendous reduction in friction. Basically pay-per-view on
steroids.
My sense is that it would be trem
Again, this has gone beyond off-topic for the NANOG list. Please take the
discussion elsewhere.
-Mike Bolitho
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019, 3:52 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
> Back in the old days, we had the ultimate in unbundling: you walked up,
> got a ticket, and watched the movie.
>
> In principle it
Oliver-
Although I'm sure many appreciate the offer, this is not
appropriate content for the NANOG mailing list.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 5:46 PM Oliver O'Boyle
wrote:
> Just a reminder. The ticket remains unclaimed. If it makes you feel
> better, I'll raise the price from free to $10 :)
>
> $1
+1
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 4:25 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
> Oliver-
>
> Although I'm sure many appreciate the offer, this is not
> appropriate content for the NANOG mailing list.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 5:46 PM Oliver O'Boyle
> wrote:
>
>> Just a reminder. The ticket remains unclaimed. If it
My apologies.
Oliver
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019, 19:42 Mehmet Akcin, wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 4:25 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
>
>> Oliver-
>>
>> Although I'm sure many appreciate the offer, this is not
>> appropriate content for the NANOG mailing list.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 5:46
- On Nov 27, 2019, at 8:03 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
> I don't understand how you're using "teams" here. For the most part you
> turn it on, and end-user systems pick up the RA and do the right thing.
> If you want something fancier, you can do that with DHCP, static
> address
12 matches
Mail list logo
