wrong fusion on peering db
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:35 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm looking for any info that might be publicly available regarding
> intentions to merge the Primus ASN into Birch/Fusion Network, or whether it
> will remain its own thing.
>
> Primus acquired by Birc
Mea culpa. I'm actually not finding much for Fusion Connect Inc. in terms
of normal BGP presence (peeringdb page, an AS that's known to tools like
the bgp.he.net tool, etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birch_Communications
AS20175 Birch Communications Inc. doesn't appear to be doing much of
anyt
> https://github.com/jda/maintnote-std/blob/master/standard.md
>
> NTT / AS 2914’s NOC follows this process to keep customers and partners
> informed about maintenances.
Is there commercial or open source software that already has this implemented?
Back at NANOG in Chicago 2016 someone was working on a standards for
Maintenance notifications with calendar invites attached. Not sure what
happened with it.
I think this was it.
https://archive.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=2853
Erik Sundberg
Sr. Network Engineer
office 773.661.5532
m
I'm pretty sure that's a different Fusion than described in the press
release.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:36 AM Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm looking for any info that might be publicly available regarding
> intentions to merge the Primus ASN into Birch/Fusion Network, or whether it
> wil
I connect to Globalinx (another Birch acquisition) via AS17184. It looks like
they also have AS16526.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Kuhnke"
To: "TJ Trout"
Cc: "nanog@nanog.or
The Globalinx network was migrated into the Fusion network earlier this year
about 27 Weeks Ago is what my router interface tells me. We ended up running
new interconnects with them and changing peering from Globalinx’s ASN to the
Fusion Network ASN 11696. The birch ASN 17184 is reachable via AS
I think what caused initial confusion and my identification of the wrong
"Fusion Network" was that AS11696 doesn't appear to have a peeringdb page.
In my recent experience with internal documentation for 40+ peers that are
equal to or larger than them in size, it's the first AS I've seen without
on
8 matches
Mail list logo
