HE doesn't provide any community based TE and I would say they're a pretty
major network.
Filip
On 14 June 2019 2:17:43 am GMT+02:00, Joe Provo
wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 09:58:20AM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
>> Hey Joe,
>>
>> On 12 Jun 2019, at 12:37, Joe Provo
>wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Ju
On 13/Jun/19 20:06, Matt Harris wrote:
>
> With the client config generator package, "openvpn-client-export",
> installed, this is imho the best option for an end-user VPN. pfSense
> has a much nicer UI than OpenVPN AS, and that UI also supports other
> things you might need (like routing proto
On 14/06/2019 01:11, Eric Tykwinski wrote:
> This is the second time I’ve seen WireGuard this past week, and honestly
> sounds really promising.
> I’m probably going to test out on VyOS since I know it has support, but any
> word on ASA or JunOS?
If you want to take VyOS 1.2.x for a test drive
> On Jun 14, 2019, at 4:02 AM, Filip Hruska wrote:
>
> HE doesn't provide any community based TE and I would say they're a pretty
> major network.
With all respect to my friends at HE, this is a major gap for a network in
2019. I know this has lost them business over time with customers le
On Jun 13, 2019, at 1:32 PM, Randy Bush mailto:ra...@psg.com>>
wrote:
OpenVPN in pfSense?
yep
We run tons of these around the world.
i only do 0.5kg
wireguard, https://www.wireguard.com/, is simpler (always a good thing
with security), and has had code looked at by some credible experts.
r
I see evpn mac/host routes in the evpn database. I added an L3 irb
interface into the epvn and suddenly I see those /32 host routes put into
inet.0 (where the irb.x resides).
Is there a best practice for distributing/advertising those inet.0 evpn host
routes throughout my global routing domain
Just wondering, is the client export actually tied to the logged in
user, or can every user download all other VPN profiles (which hopefully
are of little use as credentials are likely unknown)? It used to be that
way, would be nice if it is tied to just the logged in user.
Cheers,
Jasper
On
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@li
Yo All!
Is it no longer required to monitor the postmaster@ ?
Did RFC 822 and RFC 5321 get repealed? Or is M$ more special than the
rest of us?
RGDS
GARY
---
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 9
Postmaster@ is so widely spammed as to be useless. Standards, and even laws,
can be overcome by reality. Witness the DoNotCall list.
-mel beckman
> On Jun 14, 2019, at 6:45 PM, Gary E. Miller wrote:
>
> Yo All!
>
> Is it no longer required to monitor the postmaster@ ?
>
> Did RFC 822 and RF
10 matches
Mail list logo
