b...@theworld.com writes:
> The predecessor to sendmail was delivermail, 1979, also written by
> Eric Allman.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delivermail
Damn. Now you made me read RFC801 and wonder why we didn't have an
updated version for the IPv6 transition. Or: Where would the Internet
On 2/22/19 12:03 AM, John Curran wrote:
Either way, until such time your solution is deployed widely enough to
significantly impact network operations, it’s unlikely to be a
particularly relevant topic for discussion here.
Notable exception: DMARC. Broke email lists everywhere - including
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 19:01:40 -0700, "Forrest Christian (List Account)"
may have written:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 1:24 PM Matthew Black
> wrote:
> > Have you ever created a sendmail.cf without using M4?
>
> I still believe that sendmail is Alien technology. How else can one
> explain sendmai
On 22 Feb 2019, at 7:08 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> On 2/22/19 12:03 AM, John Curran wrote:
>
>> Either way, until such time your solution is deployed widely enough to
>> significantly impact network operations, it’s unlikely to be a particularly
>> relevant topic for discussion here.
>>
>
On 2/22/19 10:07 AM, John Curran wrote:
On 22 Feb 2019, at 7:08 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 2/22/19 12:03 AM, John Curran wrote:
Either way, until such time your solution is deployed widely enough to
significantly impact network operations, it’s unlikely to be a particularly
relevant topi
On 22 Feb 2019, at 9:58 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> On 2/22/19 10:07 AM, John Curran wrote:
>
>> On 22 Feb 2019, at 7:08 AM, Miles Fidelman
>> wrote:
>>> On 2/22/19 12:03 AM, John Curran wrote:
>>>
Either way, until such time your solution is deployed widely enough to
significant
On 2/22/19 11:28 AM, John Curran wrote:
On 22 Feb 2019, at 9:58 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 2/22/19 10:07 AM, John Curran wrote:
On 22 Feb 2019, at 7:08 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 2/22/19 12:03 AM, John Curran wrote:
Either way, until such time your solution is deployed widely enough
On Friday, 22 February, 2019 09:36, Miles Fidelman :
> But re. "one doesn't communicate with folks .. etc." --- when one has
> ongoing communication with a large group of people (e.g., an email
> list) --- and a large provider shuts a door, the impact is on more than
> just the customers of that
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@li
On 02/22/2019 09:28 AM, John Curran wrote:
If you (or your email service provider) deploy an optional solution
(e.g. DMARC p=reject) that prevents you from receiving email from mailing
lists sending in conformance with existing standards, then that’s
your choice.
From the perspective of inbou
2 days ago my IPv6 BGP session to Cogent's Blackhole server went down
(2001:550:0:1000::421C:802), I've spent all morning emailing their NOC
and I'm getting nowhere. Anyone else seeing this? Im in the Phila Metro
area.
-John
Out of St. Louis, mine has been up since the last reboot of my router.
2001:550:0:1000::421c:802 is my peering..
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Websit
Looks like they finally fixed it.. it just sporadically came back up. My
v4 and v6 transit sessions were never effected. Who knows...
-John
On 2/22/19 1:18 PM, Dennis Burgess via NANOG wrote:
Out of St. Louis, mine has been up since the last reboot of my router.
2001:550:0:1000::421c:802 is
On February 22, 2019 at 10:50 bj...@mork.no (Bjørn Mork) wrote:
> b...@theworld.com writes:
>
> > The predecessor to sendmail was delivermail, 1979, also written by
> > Eric Allman.
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delivermail
>
> Damn. Now you made me read RFC801 and wonder why
I'm sure some will react to this viscerally but I'd argue that a large
chunk of the spam issue is an operational issue due to factors like:
1. Volume, bandwidth
2. Spammers' address block hijacking and other misuse of resources
3. Revenge (typically DDoS) attacks by spammers
4. General operation
On 2/22/19 11:27 AM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
> I don't know the high-water mark for the number of IMPs or more
> specifically how many existed on the NCP->TCP flag day but I'm pretty
> sure the theoretical maximum was 256 tho no doubt someone had a way to
> extend that. But, w/o extensive changes,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:42 AM wrote:
> But when someone says to me spam isn't much of a problem because it's
> mostly blocked by local filtering (i.e., they don't see much spam in
> their inbox), usually in an attempt to shut down any discussion
> entirely, I know I'm hearing from someone who h
I don't think there's anything wrong with sounding out some ideas if
they arose from careful thought and sufficient experience and subject
knowledge.
Just saying call us when you've got a unicorn in hand is a brush-off.
But one has to find the right venue for such brainstorming which I
think is
18 matches
Mail list logo
