Hi,
Unlucky as always, we had issues with the chassis of a MX104 about
every years since we installed.
I thinking the vibration from the train track above our location
might be having an effect on connectors in those chassis, but we never
got a "autopsy" report back from JNP abou
On 14/Feb/19 14:04, Alain Hebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unlucky as always, we had issues with the chassis of a MX104 about
> every years since we installed.
Are you using the MX104 as a route reflector? If so, make one of the
VM's your alternative for this function :-).
If you're not doing a
To not get off-topic too much, since you mentioned MX204, please tell me, do
you know if it is a nice MPLS P/PE box ? If so, is it quite capable in its
ability to do L3 VPN's, L2 VPN's (l2circuit mainly, but also curious of vpls,
evpn).
Actually I'm considering it as a router for my ENNI hand-
Not sure if this is what y'all are talking about, but I use lots of Juniper
ACX5048 (previously Cisco ME3600 or ASR9000) for mpls-capable router edging in
native ip/ethernet from ftth gpon network into mpls l2circuits and LOTS of
vrf vrf for public ip, vrf for cgnat for private ip, vrf for v
It frightens me when I realize how long it's been since I was active in
NANOG (2006?, but a lot before then). Happily, I'm surfacing from a lot
of health and personal issues, and starting to do some consulting.
*waves to lots of old friends, thinking of the time, in frustration,
that I called V
Aaron,
Indeed the ACX5048 is a great box but expensive. I was talking about using
the Gig-e ports of a 48 port switch to face subscribers, and asking what
low cost IP-Capable MPLS capable 48 port switch fits that role. Basically
an access switch for AE.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 9:10 AM Aaron G
A much more common configuration is a combination of a low cost 48-port L2
aggregation switch, something whitebox or similar to a Taiwanese OEM/ODM
such as edgecore, with a single 10GbE uplink to a small MPLS-capable
router. One 10Gbps link can fit a great many 1GbE active-E residential
customers i
> Congrats Jay, this is awesome news!
Thanks, Alex!
> I’m interested to hear what is preventing you from creating ROAs for all of
> your announcements.
>
> > We will publish more ROAs over time. Thusfar we have been utilizing
> > ARIN's hosted model, but down the road ARIN's delegated m
thanks for all feedback, I have tried to summarize my thoughts in a video,
hoping this is useful set of notes https://youtu.be/4gihKxb6uys
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 9:46 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 15/Dec/18 19:37, nanog-...@mail.com wrote:
>
> >
> > I certainly subscribe to the notion that tr
> Did this tool die on the vine?
> https://cyclops.cs.ucla.edu/
Not sure I would express it that way
https://www.cs.ucla.edu/thousandeyes-a-look-inside-two-ucla-alumnis-273-million-startup/
--
Simon.
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Colton Conor wrote:
Just wondering, but what IP-capable MPLS switches are people using to
deploy AE to residential internet connections? Most 48 port AE switches
from repetuable vendors are crazy expensive, and I can't see how the ROI
would ever work compared to GPON.
Wh
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019, Aaron Gould wrote:
Not sure if this is what y'all are talking about, but I use lots of Juniper
ACX5048 (previously Cisco ME3600 or ASR9000) for mpls-capable router edging in
native ip/ethernet from ftth gpon network into mpls l2circuits and LOTS of
vrf vrf for public
On 2/14/19 12:08 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
As a pure FTTH Active-E AN, I still think the Brocade (Extreme) CER/CES
is a good box.
The CES is...wonky. My Foundry/Brocade/Extreme SEs have steered me away
from them on more than one occasion.
The CER is fine but of course more expensive. It'll tak
Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) (2018-09-18):> I also found your analysis very
interesting and useful. Thanks for that.
>
>> What do you think about adding graphs that show the amount of actually
>> unreachable prefixes and IP space? (prefix where no alternative
>> valid/unknown announcement exists)
Need assistance with exporting flow data for inside interface of cgnat ams0
aggregated multiservice interface
I have MX960 with MS-MPC-128G doing cgnat using AMS0 (aggregated
multiservice of underlying mams interfaces) using next-hop-style vrf-aware
cgnat.
I need the cgnat inside domain int
Hey,
Have you guys seen any ODM vendor that makes platforms based on Tomahawk 3
or later OSPF optics ?
Thank you
Sam
On 14/Feb/19 17:02, Aaron Gould wrote:
> To not get off-topic too much, since you mentioned MX204, please tell me, do
> you know if it is a nice MPLS P/PE box ? If so, is it quite capable in its
> ability to do L3 VPN's, L2 VPN's (l2circuit mainly, but also curious of vpls,
> evpn).
We've
On 14/Feb/19 17:10, Aaron Gould wrote:
> Not sure if this is what y'all are talking about, but I use lots of Juniper
> ACX5048 (previously Cisco ME3600 or ASR9000) for mpls-capable router edging
> in native ip/ethernet from ftth gpon network into mpls l2circuits and LOTS of
> vrf vrf for
On 14/Feb/19 23:25, Brandon Martin wrote:
>
>
> The CES is...wonky. My Foundry/Brocade/Extreme SEs have steered me
> away from them on more than one occasion.
>
> The CER is fine but of course more expensive. It'll take a full
> Internet table, though, which is handy.
>
> For AE resi deploy
19 matches
Mail list logo
