Re: China ’s Maxim – Leave No Access Point Unexploited: The Hidden Story of China Telecom’ s BGP Hijacking

2018-11-14 Thread Alfie Pates
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by apathy. ~A

Re: IGP protocol

2018-11-14 Thread James Bensley
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 12:09, Saku Ytti wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 12:37, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > Main reasons: > > - Doesn't run over IP. > > Why is this upside? I've seen on two platforms (7600, MX) ISIS punted > on routers running ISIS without interface having ISIS. With no > abili

Re: IGP protocol

2018-11-14 Thread im
Thanks for all to letting me know. I have operating OSPF/iBGP backbone for 10+ years, now my brain has entrenched to OSPF. Now, I beginning to learn IS-IS for more knowledge. thanks! On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 12:03 AM im wrote: > > goodmorning nanog, > > I heard that OSPF is only famous in asia re

Re: IGP protocol

2018-11-14 Thread Tashi Phuntsho
> On 13 Nov 2018, at 6:34 pm, Aled Morris via NANOG wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 05:54, Brandon Martin > wrote: > I was of the impression that there was a draft or similar for > single-topology (IPv4+IPv6) OSPF. Did anything ever come of that? > > > Jun

Re: IGP protocol

2018-11-14 Thread Tashi Phuntsho
From Asia region (Bhutan): > On 10 Nov 2018, at 1:03 am, im wrote: > > I heard that OSPF is only famous in asia region… Not necessarily :-) > 1. what is your backbone's IGP protocol? IS-IS > 2. why you choose it? OSPFv3 was quite flaky (could have been OS bugs), and there wasn’t v4 suppor

Re: China ’s Maxim – Leave No Access Point Unexploited: The Hidden Story of China Telecom’ s BGP Hijacking

2018-11-14 Thread Scott Weeks
--- alfie@fdx.services wrote: From: Alfie Pates Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by apathy. --- Especially when they can do it without being seen as was discussed here years ago. I believe this was one of the discussi

Re: IGP protocol

2018-11-14 Thread Baldur Norddahl
We run a MPLS enabled network with internet in a VRF. Management is in VRF default (no VRF). The IGP is OSPFv2. IPv6 is handled by the L3VPN functionality of MPLS. So is IPv4. The IPv4 that is controlled by OSPF is totally separate from everything except management and could really be any protocol

SV: IGP protocol

2018-11-14 Thread Gustav Ulander
Hello all. We also run a small network (sub 50 PEs) It looks pretty similar to Baldurs except we run IS-IS instead of OSPF. IPV4 only in the global table with VPNV4 and VPNv6 services running on top of it. We do run a separate OBM network to handle management without being dependent on service i