Allocations, not IPs. And yes if they are reasonably static an excel
spreadsheet can go higher.
Mack
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+c-mack.mcbride=charter@nanog.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Weeks
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 2:40 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE:
If you start with Excel, down Will It Scale Road, you will be sorry, so very
sorry. Especially when it comes to v6.
Stacy
> On Jun 12, 2018, at 8:13 AM, McBride, Mack wrote:
>
> Allocations, not IPs. And yes if they are reasonably static an excel
> spreadsheet can go higher.
>
> Mack
>
>
Excel does not go down 'Will It Scale Road'.
It ignores the stop light and crashes at 'Two People Editing Lane'.
Mack
-Original Message-
From: Stacy Hughes [mailto:ipgodd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 9:43 AM
To: McBride, Mack
Cc: sur...@mauigateway.com; nanog@nanog.org
Sub
Google Docs =D
(Just to be annoying).
-
Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netFax: 514-990-9443
On 06/12/18 13:17, McBride, Mack w
> If you start with Excel, down Will It Scale Road, you will be sorry,
> so very sorry. Especially when it comes to v6.
emacs!
Better than excel at "Two People Editing Lane"
Mack
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+c-mack.mcbride=charter@nanog.org] On
Behalf Of Alain Hebert
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 12:20 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: What are people using for IPAM these days?
Once upon a time, Randy Bush said:
> > If you start with Excel, down Will It Scale Road, you will be sorry,
> > so very sorry. Especially when it comes to v6.
>
> emacs!
vim!
--
Chris Adams
Apologies for the noise. Please hit delete...
Once again I am not able to send email to the list and
have either been moderated off again (for some mistake
or some unknown reason why) or something else is going
on. Sent email to admins@, but no response, so this
is just a test to see if a
On 6/12/18 1:52 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Randy Bush said:
If you start with Excel, down Will It Scale Road, you will be sorry,
so very sorry. Especially when it comes to v6.
emacs!
vim!
ed!
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 06:29:12PM -0500, Bryan Holloway wrote:
> On 6/12/18 1:52 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Randy Bush said:
> >>> If you start with Excel, down Will It Scale Road, you will be sorry,
> >>> so very sorry. Especially when it comes to v6.
> >>
> >> emacs!
> >
> >
--- c-mack.mcbr...@charter.com wrote:
From: "McBride, Mack"
If you are managing more than a thousand IPs allocations
spreadsheets are not manageable for IPv4.
-
-
I managed a /15, two /16s and several /24s (so, well
ov
On 06/12/2018 01:10 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
> Apologies for the noise. Please hit delete...
Turns out that it's only the "Re: IPv6
faster/better proof?" thread I can't reply to.
I still can't. All I wanted to say was:
--- cb.li...@gmail.com
>>> Once upon a time, Randy Bush said:
> If you start with Excel, down Will It Scale Road, you will be sorry,
> so very sorry. Especially when it comes to v6.
emacs!
>>>
>>> vim!
>>>
>>
>> ed!
>
> TECO!
cat
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:23:14 -0700, Randy Bush said:
> emacs!
> >>> vim!
> >> ed!
> > TECO!
> cat
IBM 029.
pgpdETe0f_upT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 06/12/2018 08:26 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> emacs!
> vim!
ed!
>>> TECO!
>> cat
> IBM 029.
Youngster. IBM 026.
> On Jun 12, 2018, at 8:36 PM, Stephen Satchell wrote:
>
> On 06/12/2018 08:26 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>>> emacs!
>> vim!
> ed!
TECO!
>>> cat
>> IBM 029.
>
> Youngster. IBM 026.
Infants! Hollerith (IBM Type 1). I still own it.
Thank you everyone for all of your input.
I’ve decided to use a papyrus scroll with kosher ink for my IPAM.
I’ll let y’all know how it goes.
Thanks again.
-Mike
> On Jun 12, 2018, at 20:43, Rodney Joffe wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jun 12, 2018, at 8:36 PM, Stephen Satchell wrote:
>>
>> On 06/12/2
17 matches
Mail list logo