*" PS: For anyone who came into the middle of this argument, my point
isthat if you have no EU nexus, the realistic chances of the EU
takingaction against you round to zero. If you do have EU nexus, you
betterbehave."*
I'd say this is accurate with a few caveats and most of those won't apply
to N
Hi,
We're looking for a contact, *that works*, to get in touch with
AS4637 (Telstra/HK) about some hijacking or router sickness.
BGPmon has been reporting an hijack of AS3's subnet 18.29.238.0/23.
After being contacted by AS3, we went over the advertisement with
AS29909 and
I would like to call on organizations that provide IP reputation information to
have methods available for network operators to determine if they are on their
lists, what their reputation is, what it means, optionally evidence, and a
means of removal of negative information. Near real-time notic
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG, IRNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-s
Greetings!
Actually, what you have provided below shows the exact opposite. It shows
ColoAU have received the route from 4637 who have received it from 3257 who
have received it from 29909 who have received it from 16532 who originated it.
It infers nothing about who 16532 found the route to co
With the horse trading of post-ipv4 depletion, we almost need a reg for this.
-Ben
> On May 25, 2018, at 9:36 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> I would like to call on organizations that provide IP reputation information
> to have methods available for network operators to determine if they are on
Not just horse trading, but underhanded businesses practices where a well
known "grey services" or vpn provider will rent out their IPv4s at low low
cost to force new/small ISPs into taking these IPv4s, cleaning them
up(deblacklisting and deVPN block), and releasing them back to the services
to eff
This looks like a route that has been cached by some ISPs/routers even
though a withdrawal has actually happened.
If you actually forward packets a long the path, you'll see its not
following the AS Path suggested, instead the real route that it should be.
Bouncing your session with 4637 would lik
8 matches
Mail list logo
