Hey!
This feature is already enabled on MX with MPC cards.
--
Make it right before you make it faster.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
――― Original Message ―――
From: Adam Kajtar
Sent: 23 mai 2018 23:21 -0400
Subject: Re: Juniper BGP Convergence
So the moral of the story is... "former Level(3)" must step into the bar
and have a beer with the rest of us :-)?
Mark.
On 23/May/18 22:53, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
> I saw the below on SWINOG and thought it might add
> some fun in the middle of all this General Data
> Protection Regulation convers
I wonder if this convergence time issue wouldn't be a typical mission for «BGP
PIC Edge for MPLS Layer 3 VPNs».
But it would be necessary to migrate the DFZ to a VPN MPLS (and configure
composite nexthop and BGP PIC / «Provider Edge Link Protection»).
> Le 24 mai 2018 à 09:20, Vincent Bernat a
❦ 24 mai 2018 12:36 +0200, Olivier Benghozi :
> I wonder if this convergence time issue wouldn't be a typical mission for
> «BGP PIC Edge for MPLS Layer 3 VPNs».
> But it would be necessary to migrate the DFZ to a VPN MPLS (and
> configure composite nexthop and BGP PIC / «Provider Edge Link
> P
Yep, feature naming in JunOS...
In fact I meant «Provider Edge Link Protection», which is only for VPN (and
Labeled Unicast), and that applies here (eBGP paths are protected using iBGP
paths).
> Le 24 mai 2018 à 13:39, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
>
> ❦ 24 mai 2018 12:36 +0200, Olivier Benghozi :
MikroTik Official Response:
Cisco informed us on May 22nd of 2018, that a malicious tool was found on
several manufacturer devices, including three devices made by MikroTik. We are
highly certain that this malware was installed on these devices through a
vulnerability in MikroTik RouterOS soft
Send them an email at the listed email address.
Geolocation is always a pain.
It can take months to get it straight.
Mack
Contractor
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+c-mack.mcbride=charter@nanog.org] On
Behalf Of Clay Stewart
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 8:50 AM
There’s speculation that enforcement could occur via the FTC Privacy Shield
program.
> On May 23, 2018, at 7:38 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
>> No, but in the absence of a law that specifically bars the courts from
>> doing so the will under current reciprocal treaty arrangements.
>
> No, really,
Has anyone worked with Nuage from around here? Additionally, is anyone familiar
with what RFC Alcatel/Nokia is implementing for the VXLAN part of the solution?
It looks a bit non-standard but I can't find any clear documentation regarding
this anywhere
Cheers,
S.
> On May 23, 2018, at 7:18 PM, K. Scott Helms wrote:
>
> Anything that can tie back to an individual data subject is PII, that means
> email addresses, names in combination with addresses or phone numbers, finger
> prints, or even insufficiently abstracted internal ID numbers/codes.
Don't fo
Anne,
While I was re-reading some of the emails last night I realized that I
mischaracterized your description here, *"You may accuse me of being a
lawyer here (and rightly so :-) ), but "in", as in "in the Union" (which is
the actual language) is very much open to interpretation. In a judicial
Hi Bezeq people,
I hope you're subscribed here, I could use your immediate help, probably
leading to a contract...
Yours,
Elmar.
--- sab...@auxes.is wrote:
From: "Sabina M."
Additionally, is anyone familiar with what RFC Alcatel/Nokia
is implementing for the VXLAN part of the solution? It looks
a bit non-standard but I can't find any clear documentation
regarding this anywhere
On 5/24/18 12:24 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- sab...@auxes.is wrote:
From: "Sabina M."
Additionally, is anyone familiar with what RFC Alcatel/Nokia
is implementing for the VXLAN part of the solution? It looks
a bit non-standard but I can't find any clear documentation
regarding this anywhere
In article <0bb31bbb-388d-4832-85dd-30c01c187...@jeffmurphy.org> you write:
>There’s speculation that enforcement could occur via the FTC Privacy Shield
>program.
Privacy Shield is entirely optional. Joining it requires a lot of
paperwork and a substantial administrative fee. If you don't do al
15 matches
Mail list logo
