Maybe we are missing a key item here.
Ryan, is the attack on the BGP peering range killing your router or is
it an attack saturating the link?
Do you have some netflow samples of one of these attacks or any kind of
hints of what happened?
Jean St-Laurent
On 04/18/2018 11:01 PM, Roland Do
I've been testing IPInfusion OcNOS running on Dell Z9100 and S4048. I've
run a couple of test cases using MPLS LDP signaled port based and VLAN
based VPWS (pseudowire / e-line / xconnect / Juniper CCC) and VPLS (e-lan)
over an OSPFv2 IGP. It's working well between Dell/IPI to Dell/IPI boxes.
We h
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 05:29:35PM +, Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG wrote:
> So why are you proposing that I can't run my *personal* "I strongly
> believe in {insert emotionally-charged issue} site" without letting psychos
> know exactly where I live?
A PO box might suffice. There are also mai
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 08:20:06PM +, Filip Hruska wrote:
> Scraping WHOIS systems for thousands domains at once using the WHOIS
> protocol is easy though. There are "WHOIS History" sites which scrape all
> domains and then publish the data along with the date of retrieval.
Which would not be
Aren't there issues/concerns with Huawei ?
I think we pay about $10k with discounts and about (4) 10 gig port license to
slow start our deployment of ACX5048's 10 gig east , 10 gig west , dual
10's facing FTTH OLT (Calix E7)
-Aaron
Thank you very much to everyone.
The budget is around 3000-5000 $ each, possibly.
There are many devices that could match our needs but as usual the dark
side of this market is the platforms compatibility. We deployed many
Mikrotik and Ericsson devices, hope they will "match" with a Cisco or
J
Colton,
> On 19 Apr 2018, at 03:32, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> Cisco has mutliple options, but mainly the NCS based on your port count I
> think. Supposely the C3850 and C9500 now support MPLS? There is a new 16
> port 10G version of the C9500. I haven't looked into Nexus switches. Does
> Nexus sup
Of possible interest to this group.
Forwarding at Alexander’s suggestion, who says he has already shared info in
the NANOG facebook group "(with updated prefixlist)".
—Sandy
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Alexander Isavnin
> Subject: [cooperation-wg] Massive IP blockings in Russia
> D
I know I saw a significant number of suspicious routes from 31133 in the past
day or two as well.
There appears to be some pretty widespread bogus routing.
- jared
> On Apr 19, 2018, at 1:36 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
>
> Of possible interest to this group.
>
> Forwarding at Alexander’s sugg
Łukasz,
Out of all those Cisco models, which meets the OP requirements of " (at
least 24) SFP+ ports 10G and at least a couple of upstream ports 40G
capable" and a " The budget is around 3000-5000 $ each, possibly. "?
The Nexus 7000's look very large with the smallest being 3U in size, so I
dou
I guess this is already a big issue + this is going to be a problem for
people attending the FIFA World Cup using information from the cloud
(few people, no?)
Ale,
El 19/4/18 a las 1:36 p. m., Sandra Murphy escribió:
> Of possible interest to this group.
>
> Forwarding at Alexander’s suggest
Curious if any RCN network guys or gals are on the list and can provide
any idea as to when RCN plans on deploying IPv6?
I make inquiries every six months or so, but I get the usual canned
response that it's in the works, but no ETA.
On 4/19/18 1:36 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
> Russian ISPs MUST fully block all traffic to such networks. The list is
> frequently updated and gets automatically propagated to ISP every once in a
> while, failure to block any address may result in 1500eur fine.
Per day? That's a cost of doing busi
Yes, there are issues/concerns with using Huawei in the USA, but in the
rest of the world they are the number 2 vendor. Also, $3500 for that box
with lifetime support and warranty (their TAC is in Plano, Texas) vs
$10,000 for an ACX5048 onetime plus at least $1500 a year for JTAC seems
like a big d
You still have the same end result. Bad data. I could use a mail
forwarding service or fake the record entirely. My VoIP provider probably
won't cough up who owns the phone number without a warrant. Probably the
same for HelloFax. And the only name verification that goes on at my
domain regist
On 4/19/18 1:38 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote:
Curious if any RCN network guys or gals are on the list and can provide
any idea as to when RCN plans on deploying IPv6?
I make inquiries every six months or so, but I get the usual canned
response that it's in the works, but no ETA.
Clarification:
Ben,
The Dell options intrigue me. First question is who do you talk to at Dell
about their solutions as most sales guys just seem to know their laptop and
server lines?
How does Dell's pricing compare with Edge-Core. Considering most of the
hardware is the same Broadcom chipset, what are the reas
Thanks for sharing,
Note of caution - there is a mess going on with this blocking so if some IP
range/domain is not in any list it doesn't necessary mean it is not
blocked. Lists are created/updated pretty sporadically (e.g. the list does
not say so but there are reports of blocked DigitalOCean net
You are not supposed to announce that range anyway as you shouldn't be
announcing your infrastructure range for your protection. Ask your upstream
providers not to expose that range too.
There are many ways around that selective redistribution or they can just
protect that range. How they do i
Not sure exactly what your environment looks like, but we encountered
something similar when trunking Cisco-DELL and Cisco-Juniper switches.
We run RSTP on DELL and Juniper switches, but RPVST+ on Cisco. In the
beginning we just allow those VLANS we need between Cisco-DELL/Juniper
switches, then en
The ZTE 5960 with 48x SFP+ and 4x QSFP28 (40G and 100G capable) will do it
within the budget listed. We use it for MPLS and VPLS.
Regards
Baldur
Den tor. 19. apr. 2018 18.17 skrev Giuseppe Spanò - Datacast Srl <
sp...@datacast.it>:
> Thank you very much to everyone.
>
> The budget is around 300
I just want to add my voice to basically the same sentiment (way
below...)
With all the data breaches it's almost become easier to list companies
who haven't had a massive data breach lately.
And once someone walks off with that db it's out there forever tho
admittedly still a little more diffic
One of the memes driving this WHOIS change is the old idea of
"starving the beast".
People involved in policy discussions complain that "spammers" -- many
only marginally fit that term other than by the strictest
interpretation -- use the public WHOIS data to contact domain owners.
I've countere
Inline...
On April 19, 2018 at 22:24 fa...@gatech.edu (Badiei, Farzaneh) wrote:
> “Granted there's
> that gray area of dissident political movements etc. but their full
> time job is protecting their identity.”
>
>
>
> You think? The median number of domain name registration that used
In article <23257.12824.250276.763...@gargle.gargle.howl> you write:
>So you think restricting WHOIS access will protect dissidents from
>abusive governments?
>
>Of all the rationalizations that one seems particularly weak.
Oh, you're missing the point. This is a meme that's been floating
around
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 5:20 PM wrote:
> So you think restricting WHOIS access will protect dissidents from
> abusive governments?
>
Every government has subpoena power. Some of them even have the power to
beat people with a rubber hose in the back room until they get the
information they want.
On April 19, 2018 at 22:43 jo...@iecc.com (John Levine) wrote:
> In article <23257.12824.250276.763...@gargle.gargle.howl> you write:
> >So you think restricting WHOIS access will protect dissidents from
> >abusive governments?
> >
> >Of all the rationalizations that one seems particularly we
On April 20, 2018 at 02:58 aa...@heyaaron.com (Aaron C. de Bruyn) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 5:20 PM wrote:
>
> So you think restricting WHOIS access will protect dissidents from
> abusive governments?
>
>
> Every government has subpoena power. Some of them even have the
28 matches
Mail list logo
