Re: How are you configuring BFD timers?

Not directly related, but I wonder: how common is micro-BFD for detecting bundle member failures? On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:12 PM Måns Nilsson wrote: > > > --On 22 mars 2018 23:45:16 +0200 Saku Ytti wrote: > > > On 22 March 2018 at 22:41, Måns Nilsson > > wrote: > > > >> Subject: Re: How ar

Firewall as a Service.

Are there any vendors that have hardware firewalls and maintain their own Openstack nova/neutron driver set? I’m looking for something that I can offer to my VPS customers as a self-managed service. At the moment, I’m using the default firewall driver. Which is nothing but a wrapper for iptab

Yet another Quadruple DNS?

dig google.com @1.1.1.1 Cloudflare? Didn't find any news around it

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

> On Mar 28, 2018, at 11:14 AM, Payam Poursaied wrote: > > dig google.com @1.1.1.1 > Cloudflare? Yeah, Cloudflare did a deal with Geoff Huston to use it. It’s reserved for “experimental use." -Bill signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

Many providers filter out 1.1.1.1 because too many people use it in their examples/test code. I doubt that it's a usable IP/service. On 28 March 2018 at 12:14, Payam Poursaied wrote: > dig google.com @1.1.1.1 > > > > Cloudflare? > > Didn't find any news around it > >

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

Out of 1,000 RIPE Atlas Probes, only 34 report it as unreachable. Very good latency from those who can reach it.. https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/11859210/#!general Antonis > On 28 Mar 2018, at 23:13, Michael Crapse wrote: > > Man

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

> On Mar 28, 2018, at 4:13 PM, Michael Crapse wrote: > > Many providers filter out 1.1.1.1 because too many people use it in their > examples/test code. I doubt that it's a usable IP/service. There’s at least one vendor *cough* cisco *cough* that has used it as captive portal IP. I’m not sur

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Michael Crapse wrote: > Many providers filter out 1.1.1.1 because too many people use it in their > examples/test code. I doubt that it's a usable IP/service. > > having previously globally announce 1.1.1.1 ... and some other of it's friends... not nearly enough p

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

1.1.1.0/24 and 1.0.0.0/24 both are APNIC's Lab Research Prefixes. APNIC, probably doing some more data gathering on 1.1.1.1 and doesn't want to be smashed with Gigs of traffic. Transit is still quite expensive in Aus :) https://www.apnic.net/wp-content/uploads/prop-109/assets/prop-109-v001.txt O

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

A reminder to go back and watch the awesome talk from Nanog 49 about this: https://youtu.be/RBOPcLpQZ8w https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/presentations/Monday/karir-1slash8.pdf - Jared > On Mar 28, 2018, at 4:25 PM, Aftab Siddiqui wrote: > > 1.1.1.0/24 and 1.0.0.0/24 both are APNIC's Lab

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

> On Mar 28, 2018, at 2:39 PM, David Ulevitch wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:27 PM Aftab Siddiqui > wrote: > 1.1.1.0/24 and 1.0.0.0/24 both are APNIC's Lab Research Prefixes. APNIC, > probably doing some more data gathering on 1.1.1.1 and doesn't want to be > smashed with Gigs of traffi

Re: Qu??bec Sales tax

    Same deal as Paypal and EBay.     Netflix dropping their services in CDN/QC only serve attempt at making yet another market grab.     At the end Netflix may just charge the Tax and funnel it to the govt.  They'll still be making a bundle.         ( And with all the hardware already de

Re: Qu??bec Sales tax

bell canada? /kc On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 05:45:26PM -0400, Alain Hebert said: >?? Same deal as Paypal and EBay. > >?? Netflix dropping their services in CDN/QC only serve >attempt at making yet another market grab. > > >?? At the end Netflix may just charge the Tax and

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

On March 28, 2018 6:14:26 PM UTC, Payam Poursaied wrote: >dig google.com @1.1.1.1 Cute. I'm sure this engineering effort to centralize a distributed service will also go a long way to spur IPv6 adoption. -- Izaac

validating reachability via an ISP

Hi all, I have an enterprise network and do not provide transit. In one of our datacenters we have our own prefixes and rely on two ISPs as BGP neighbors to provide global reachability for our prefixes. One is a large regional provider and the other is a large global provider. Recently we took

Re: Qu??bec Sales tax

On 2018-03-28 17:45, Alain Hebert wrote: >     Same deal as Paypal and EBay. Paypal and EBay have not worked fevereshly to avoid a presence in Canada. They have presence and already handle the taxes. >     Netflix dropping their services in CDN/QC only serve > attempt at making yet another ma

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:27 PM Aftab Siddiqui wrote: > 1.1.1.0/24 and 1.0.0.0/24 both are APNIC's Lab Research Prefixes. APNIC, > probably doing some more data gathering on 1.1.1.1 and doesn't want to be > smashed with Gigs of traffic. Doubtful. This is most assuredly going to be a commercial

Re: validating reachability via an ISP

On 3/29/2018 2:22 AM, Andy Litzinger wrote: > Hi all, > I have an enterprise network and do not provide transit. In one of our > datacenters we have our own prefixes and rely on two ISPs as BGP neighbors > to provide global reachability for our prefixes. One is a large regional > provider and th