On Fri, Dec 8, 2017, at 21:02, Job Snijders wrote:
> Nothing wrong with using xxx.0 or xxx::0 in the context of a host route
> (/32 or /128).
https://labs-pre.ripe.net/Members/stephane_bortzmeyer/all-ip-addresses-are-equal-dot-zero-addresses-are-less-equal
For a host route, no problem. For the ho
What kind of internet are these devices on? With Net Neutrality gone here
in the US it would be a good way to measure certain services such as SIP to
see which ISP's if any are tampering with packets.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Janusz Jezowicz
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Feel free to shoot me d
Are these your customer-owned routers?
-mel beckman
> On Dec 15, 2017, at 5:24 AM, Janusz Jezowicz wrote:
>
> Since these are mostly end-user routers they are on regular ISPs (like
> Comcast, Verizon etc). I believe this could be quite suitable for
> monitoring net neutrality. Feel free to pin
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:47:42 -0500, Dovid Bender said:
> What kind of internet are these devices on? With Net Neutrality gone here
> in the US it would be a good way to measure certain services such as SIP to
> see which ISP's if any are tampering with packets.
Given previous history, the answer w
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG, CaribNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG, IRNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sen
Bump for Hulu.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Crapse"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 3:38:20 PM
Subject: Geolocation: IPv4 Subnet blocked by HULU, and
6 matches
Mail list logo
