Harlan Stenn wrote:
> If you do this on enough boxes, you should have an easy time seeing what
> happens on boxes where you have an easier time watching ntpd's drift
> value than you have watching a nearby dedicated temperature sensor.
sweet from a technical point of view, but if you have elevated
We use Asentria.
On 07/13/17 22:33 -0400, Dovid Bender wrote:
All,
We had an issue with a DC where temps were elevated. The one bit of
hardware that wasn't watched much was the one that sent out the initial
alert. Looking for recommendations on hardware that I can mount/hang in
each cabinet tha
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is mentioned already but here goes,
You need to understand the difference between peering and a direct
interconnect.
with an interconnect you have to think about is the traffic enough to
"dedicate" a port for that connection on your edge. ( cost of port vs cost
if you wo
Awesome!
Thanks for all of the feedback.
I am going through the links you sent me and I think they will be of very good
help.
I guess it was a general question but that was kinda the point, get feed back
from all the pro's 😉
thank you very much again.
From:
If all that you require is temperature monitoring, I recommend going
through the SNMP MIBs and doing an snmpwalk of your devices to identify the
sensors at the air intake... Unfortunately there are some devices which do
not have air intake sensors, but only a sensor somewhere generally in the
cent
We're seeing our deferred queues fill up with mail to Yahoo. Some mail
appears to be delivering, but many are not. Is anyone else experiencing
problems delivering mail to Yahoo? The Internet suggests that this error
has been a result of Yahoo stability in the past.
The following message is coming
Okay I will just throw this, in addition to what the others have said. From an
ISP point of view, assuming the neighbor is able to provision their end of the
cross-connect, you need to check the common POP cost requirements, and also
consider if the neighbor is willing to either pay for the peer
Anyone have experience with Gripple's seismic bracing vs Unistrut's?
Looking at putting something in on the Farallons for a rack there and
Gripple's system looks lighter and possibly easier to install...
http://grippleseismic.com/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2017/03/BROC-SEISMIC-US-10_16-web.pdf
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
MENOG, SAFNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists
Warning: For just plain curiosity at the moment.
I was looking for publicly accessible feasibility studies, white
papers, etc, about long distance fiber deployment. (> 400km, aka >250
miles)
The interest comes from documenting myself about how poorly
deserved are the northern c
I think the Artic Fiber project is designed to alleviate that problem in the
Northwest. It was incorporated into a larger project to connect the three
continents. I know one of the founders, Mike Cunningham.
http://www.submarinenetworks.com/systems/asia-europe-africa/arctic-fiber/arctic-fibre-a
I went back a few years in the archives and found a few odd references, but
not much discussion. I'm curious what some other approaches are to
usage-based billing, both the practice of generating/correlating data and
the billing itself.
We bill based on use/95th percentile and our system is rud
On the HFC / CMTS side of things we have IPDR which I believe has some open
source collectors out there. I'm not sure that IPDR is used much outside of the
HFC world though.
Luke Guillory
Vice President – Technology and Innovation
Tel:985.536.1212
Fax:985.536.0300
Email: lguill..
Was there a list of folks collecting to provide fix actions for
hotel/airport/etc?
Seems that IAD / Washington Dulles don't like "random" tcp/443 sites on the
internet? 173.194.205.129
for instance, ping, traceroute, http but no https :(
https works just fine from lots of other places on the tub
I've found many times it's the other way around, with highly restrictive
captive portals that only allow traffic to 80 and 443. This is exactly the
reason why I have an OpenVPN server running in tcp mode (not udp) on 443.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> Was there a
Yea, I was able to get around the broken-ness with openvpn, but.. that's
sad :( and not everyone has that capability.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> I've found many times it's the other way around, with highly restrictive
> captive portals that only allow traffic to 80 and
some years back, narita blocked 443 not 80, blocked 465 & 587 not 25,
etc. i actually found a clue receptacle and it was fixed some weeks
later.
i suspect the number of things they can do wrongly may be bounded but is
quite large.
randy
This is exactly why i have SSHd on port 443 and 53 on one of my boxes/IPs. Once
I got SSH sky's the limit on what I can fix/setup/tunnel.
/kc
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:43:21PM -0700, Eric Kuhnke said:
>I've found many times it's the other way around, with highly restrictive
>captive portals
Could also do: OpenVPN, with a proxy in front, that listen to all
the ports in case they're using a gateway that transparent proxy some
protocol.
2017 version of wack-a-mole.
-
Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 2
> On Jul 14, 2017, at 5:04 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
>
>
> This is exactly why i have SSHd on port 443 and 53 on one of my boxes/IPs.
> Once
> I got SSH sky's the limit on what I can fix/setup/tunnel.
>
> /kc
> --
> Ken Chase - m...@sizone.org Guelph Canada
This is my usual workaround as well.
Using sshd on port 443, I can ssh my box with a tunnel to a local squid. My
browser then use this tunneled proxy to go to internet.
Private and secure.
> Le 14 juil. 2017 à 23:04, Ken Chase a écrit :
>
>
> This is exactly why i have SSHd on port 443 and 53 on one of my boxes/IPs.
> Once
>
port 53 seems to be the biggest hole available, no one figures that anyone
will send actual data over port 53, other than DNS! (and they [have to] leave
TCP open, because of the nice handywavy implimentations of dns lookups :)
some captive portals intercept all IP traffic regardless of dns, others
22 matches
Mail list logo
