Hello Hello,
Proudly I want to announce that 1st IRNOG Meeting will launch at 24th of
May in Tehran.
In the first day of public announce we had near 90 people registered to
attend the meeting.
Hope to find this meeting useful in Iranian Community. It would be great to
get your ideas about the exper
Are the terms tier-1,2,3 dead terms or still valid ways to define carriers?
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 8:45 AM Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> Are the terms tier-1,2,3 dead terms or still valid ways to define carriers?
>
Yes, pretty much dead.
There are networks that meet your price / performance, and those that
don't.
So there are now Carrier Class carriers and Food Grade Carriers?
Who in the greater community defines terms like this?
> On May 13, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Ca By wrote:
>
>
>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 8:45 AM Matt Hoppes
>> wrote:
>> Are the terms tier-1,2,3 dead terms or still valid ways to defin
This debate has spilled onto NANOG from Facebook now...
My point is that while the term tier-1 (meaning no transit) isn't wrong, that
the whole system is now irrelevant. Look at the Wikipedia list of "Tier 1"
networks and then look at CAIDA, Dyn, QRator, HE's BGP Report, etc. There's
some over
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 9:01 AM Mike Hammett wrote:
> This debate has spilled onto NANOG from Facebook now...
>
> My point is that while the term tier-1 (meaning no transit) isn't wrong,
> that the whole system is now irrelevant. Look at the Wikipedia list of
> "Tier 1" networks and then look at
6 matches
Mail list logo
