I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s unwanted, where Telstra domestic is
announcing to Telstra International, who in turn announces to Cogent.
Regards,
Marty Strong
--
Cloudflare - AS13335
Network Engineer
ma...@cloudflare.com
+44 7584 906 055
smartflare (Skype)
EZIP has no transition strategy and is not backwards compatible with
IPv4. The scheme is unworkable.
It is not possible to dual stack EZIP because it pretends to be IPv4.
The author of EZIP should demonstrate a working prototype. We need to
see a setup with two clients on a shared external IP
On 08-03-2017 00:27, Dennis Bohn wrote:
In addition, IPv6 has link local addresses.
This one seemingly insignificant detail causes so much code churn
and is probably responsible for 10 years of the IPv6 drag.
AFAICT, Cisco V6 HSRP (mentioning that brand only because it caused me to
try to fig
Good Morning,
Is anyone having access issues into sites within scalematrix.net network?
Our traces make it out of Cogent and into Level3 and either die in
Level3 or a couple hops past Level3 into scalematrix.net network.
If someone from Scalmatrix or Level3 reads this, can you email me
offli
On mer. 8 mars 09:29:11 2017, Marty Strong via NANOG wrote:
> I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s unwanted, where Telstra domestic is
> announcing to Telstra International, who in turn announces to Cogent.
I wouldn’t too, especially since I don’t see it anymore:
alarig@nominoe:~ % birdc6 show route
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tom Smyth
Date: Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:02 PM
Subject: CIA Exploits on Mikrotik Hardware /Software
To: INEX Members Technical Mailing List
Hi Lads,
For MikroTik Users in the community there are apparently live exploits
for MikroTik software and appa
Hello,
there were 2 typos on that maiil
1) I used lads (sorry force of habit) was meant in the sense of
Gender Neutrality as opposed to excluding ladies,
2) the sample firewall rules had a space missing with the wrong
address list name :/
I have corrected them below
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:1
Thought the list would find this interesting. Just received an email from VZ
wireless that they’re going to stop selling static IPv4 for wireless
subscribers in June. That should make for some interesting support calls on
the broadband/fios side; one half of the company is forcing ipv6, the ot
It would have been nice if Verizon had starting issuing IPv6 while still
issuing IPv4 for an easy transition. The current situation is that you can't
get static IPv6 at all. I have been bugging them about this for many years.
thanks,
-Randy
- On Mar 8, 2017, at 12:16 PM, David Hubbard dhu
I'm assuming no consideration for using RFC-6598 addresses (100.64.0.0/10)
and performing CGN as a bridge, perhaps via LW4o6
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:31 PM Randy Carpenter
wrote:
>
> It would have been nice if Verizon had starting issuing IPv6 while still
> issuing IPv4 for an easy transition.
I got a question from a colleague that highlights an omission / lack of
clarification on my initial mail and i wanted to share...
As far as im aware and from tests i carried out about 7 or 8 years ago The
allowed from ip addresses in ip services menu uses tcp wrapers and
actually allows tcp conn
You said the e-mail was from VZ wireless but the e-mail text says Verizon. Is
it really all of Verizon, VZ Wireless, home, business or some combination?
On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:16 AM, David Hubbard
mailto:dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com>> wrote:
Thought the list would find this interesting. Just r
My customer got the email and the only service they have is wireless. Also
notice the email address.
From: Verizon Wireless
mailto:verizonwirele...@email.vzwshop.com>>
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 8, 2017, at 6:44 PM, Keith Stokes
mailto:kei...@neilltech.com>> wrote:
You said the e-mail was f
Seems to me that the only people who get static, wireless, IP addresses
are people who put sensors on vehicles and IoT applications. Who gets a
static IP for a phone? This might cause some serious heartburn for my
previous employer - who built CAD systems for transit buses.
Miles Fidelman
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
> Seems to me that the only people who get static, wireless, IP addresses
> are people who put sensors on vehicles and IoT applications. Who gets a
> static IP for a phone? This might cause some serious heartburn for my
> previous employer -
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:10 PM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Miles Fidelman >
> wrote:
>
> > Seems to me that the only people who get static, wireless, IP addresses
> > are people who put sensors on vehicles and IoT applications. Who gets a
> > static IP for a phon
On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 22:08:59 -0500, Christopher Morrow said:
> > previous employer - who built CAD systems for transit buses.
> on the bright side they can just get fios or dsl (depending on location) ..
> you know you can still get v4 there, and won't even have to worry about
> that pesky new fang
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:58 PM, wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 22:08:59 -0500, Christopher Morrow said:
> > > previous employer - who built CAD systems for transit buses.
> > on the bright side they can just get fios or dsl (depending on location)
> ..
> > you know you can still get v4 there, and
On 08/03/2017, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Seems to me that the only people who get static, wireless, IP addresses
> are people who put sensors on vehicles and IoT applications. Who gets a
> static IP for a phone? This might cause some serious heartburn for my
> previous employer - who built CAD sys
19 matches
Mail list logo
