* how...@leadmon.net (Howard Leadmon) [Fri 03 Mar 2017, 01:06 CET]:
On 3/2/2017 2:57 PM, Niels Bakker wrote:
You should ask for full routes from all your providers + a default.
If you taking full routes from everyone, why would you need a
default? If they don't show a route for it, they pro
Niels Bakker wrote:
> As I explained in the rest of my email that you conveniently didn't
> quote, it's so that you can selectively import routes from all your
> providers in situations where your router cannot handle a full table.
it can also break horribly in situations where the provider is pro
* n...@foobar.org (Nick Hilliard) [Fri 03 Mar 2017, 13:02 CET]:
Niels Bakker wrote:
As I explained in the rest of my email that you conveniently
didn't quote, it's so that you can selectively import routes from
all your providers in situations where your router cannot handle a
full table.
it
On Mar 3, 2017, at 7:00 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> Niels Bakker wrote:
>> As I explained in the rest of my email that you conveniently didn't
>> quote, it's so that you can selectively import routes from all your
>> providers in situations where your router cannot handle a full table.
>
> it c
Someone has reached out -- I'm good to go. Thanks all!
On 3/2/17 1:11 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote:
Hello all,
If someone from Qwest/Centurylink is lurking, could you contact me
off-list?
You are advertising a /24 out of a recently acquired /16, and I've been
unsuccessful reaching anyone.
Thanks
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
MENOG, SAFNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 09:42:04AM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2017, at 7:00 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> > Niels Bakker wrote:
> >> As I explained in the rest of my email that you conveniently didn't
> >> quote, it's so that you can selectively import routes from all your
> >> prov
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Job Snijders wrote:
> > There are, of course, corner cases. But in general, single-homed
> > people shouldn’t be using BGP.
>
> There are numerous reasons to use BGP when single-homed:
>
> - as preparation to multi-home in the (near) future
> - ability to q
The FCC granted an emergency temporary waiver to telecommunication
carriers serving Jewish Community Centers, allowing access to the
Caller-ID (Calling Party Number Identification) normally blocked at the
calling party's request (i.e. star-67).
Although per call Call-Trace (i.e. star-57) and
9 matches
Mail list logo
